Abstract:
Many nations world over strive to achieve Education for All (EFA) for its citizens, a
service considered to be the best building block for every society. Studies reveals that
achievement of access to education by street children has been elusive in most
countries. Kenyan Government has continued to foster development and
implementation of policy interventions towards enhanced access to education by all
children. Studies however reveal that notwithstanding heavy government funding on
policy interventions, many street children are still out of school. The purpose of this
study was to examine effectiveness of Government policy interventions towards
enhanced access to pre-primary and primary education by street children as addressed
by the following objectives: to examine policy interventions aimed at enhancing
access to pre-primary and primary education by street children, and to evaluate the
extent to which the Government policy interventions have enhanced access to pre-
primary and primary education by street children. The study was informed by
programme theory as proposed by Weiss and used Mixed Methods Research;
concurrent triangulation design approach, and pragmatism philosophical paradigm.
The study sample comprised of street children, County Directors of Education,
Quality Assurance Officers, officers in the department of children welfare, teachers in
public primary schools, Non-Governmental Organizations and Community-Based
Organizations working with street children within the selected urban centers.
Quantitative data was collected through questionnaires while qualitative data was
collected through interviews and observation guides and analysed using descriptive
and inferential statistics and thematic analysis respectively. The analysis showed that
majority of the teachers agreed that Government policy interventions had not
effectively enhanced access to pre-primary and primary education by street children.
Majority of the respondents felt that policy interventions were not adequate and that
supervision of the implementation process needed to be enhanced. Pearson
correlation coefficient of 0.711 was obtained which indicated that there was
statistically significant relationship between Government policy interventions and
access to pre-primary and primary education by street children. Anova test gave a p
value = 0.773 indicating that there was no statistically significant mean difference
between Government policy interventions and enrolment by street children in pre-
primary and primary education. The study also revealed that roles of other
stakeholders towards enhancing access to education by street children needed to be
supported and synergies with Government interventions be strengthened. The study
concluded that enhancing effectiveness of policy interventions, implementation
process and informed support to vulnerable families to mitigate factors contributing
to emergence of street children need to addressed in order to promote access to
education by street children. The study recommended that Government should
strengthen policy implementation and supervision framework and work on mitigating
social challenges that contribute to children opting for street life.