Abstract:
The Garissa Solar Power Plant is a significant contributor to Kenya's goal of achieving 100%
clean energy by 2030. Despite its significance, the lack of publicly available analyzed
technical performance data limits optimization of the plant’s efficiency and output. The main
objective of this study was to assess the plant's technical performance based on key
performance indicators. The study employed a structured approach to evaluate the plant's
performance, adhering to the IEC61724-1 international standards. It focused on key
indicators, namely; capacity utilization factor, specific yield, array yield, and performance
ratio. The monthly and daily energy generation data were obtained from the Rural
Electrification and Renewable Energy Corporation, while meteorological data were collected
from the Photovoltaic Geographical Information System and the National Solar Radiation
Database. Microsoft Excel software was utilized to apply theoretical formulas for computing
and analyzing data. System Advisor Model software was used to conduct a performance
analysis by integrating weather data, optimizing tilt and orientation, and simulating system
design to determine the most efficient system. Lastly, the study compared the simulated and
computed results based on the selected performance indicators. The power plant was
analyzed over five years from 2019 to 2023. It exhibited an average annual performance ratio
of 71.8%, capacity factor of 18.11%, system efficiency of 11.62% and specific yield of
1586.09 kWh/kWp. Analysis of irradiance data demonstrated a direct correlation with energy
output: the highest recorded energy output was 7721 MWh at an irradiance of 204.34
kWh/m²/month, while the lowest was 6469 MWh at 169 kWh/m²/month. The wind speed
and ambient temperature highlighted additional factors influencing solar power plant
performance: variations in cell temperature from 37˚C to 41˚C and up to 49˚C correspond to
energy outputs of 6469 MWh, 7812 MWh, and 7721 MWh, respectively. The tilt angle of 4˚,
closely aligned with the latitude of 0.34˚S that was optimal and facilitated self-cleaning
during rainy seasons. The study found the applied azimuth angle of 140˚ to be suboptimal
for a location in the southern hemisphere, where the azimuth angle should face north to
maximize exposure to sunlight throughout the day. The actual Ground Coverage Ratio
(GCR) of 0.625 exceeded the recommended range of 0.3–0.5 and the optimal row spacing
was calculated as 0.4 meters, less than the current 2 meters, indicating potential for increasing
the number of arrays by reducing row spacing. Comparative analysis of actual versus
simulated data revealed discrepancies, with simulated values indicating marginally higher
performance metrics—specifically, a performance ratio of 80%, a capacity factor of 20.5%,
system efficiency of 13.17%, and a specific energy yield of 1797 kWh/kWp. In conclusion,
while the power plant's performance was average, significant opportunities for optimization
existed to enhance efficiency and energy output. Recommendations included adjusting the
azimuth angle to 0°, reducing inter-row spacing to 0.4 meters to accommodate more arrays,
and implementing tailored maintenance strategies to mitigate soiling and vegetation growth,
thereby improving the overall system efficiency of the solar power plant.