Abstract:
The detrimental impacts of Climate Change have necessitated a strong and growing
impetus for University-Community Engagement (UCE) to facilitate and sustain carbon
reduction strategies and practices by higher education institutions. Taking urgent action
to combat climate change is based on the adoption of the United Nations to the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. Many African universities have embedded
climate change knowledge and programs in teaching and research, with a dearth of
literature on the third mission (community engagement). Thus, this study explored the
views and perspectives of university staff and students regarding the opportunities that
universities can engage communities to address issues of climate change (knowledge,
mitigation, and adaptation practices), particularly in an African context. The study
answered four research questions; What are the community engagement activities
implemented by the case universities on climate change? How are the case universities
developing and coordinating community engagement programs on climate change
action? What are the major constraints in the university-community collaborations in the
efforts to address climate change in selected cases? What are the opportunities that
might enhance the third mission programs towards climate change issues at the case
universities? Using Ubuntu theoretical approach, a qualitative comparative case study
design was adopted to generate data from 42 purposively selected university staff,
students of climate change related programs at the case universities and community
leaders. Data were generated through semi-structured in-depth interviews with the
university staff and community leaders and focus group discussions with students. Data
was analysed using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) thematic analysis with the help of
MAXQDA software. The findings revealed that both universities implement both
university and students-initiated and led engagement programs on climate change
action that include rendering institutional support, research and innovation programs,
climate education and awareness creation activities, and capacity-building activities
among others. These engagement programs are developed and coordinated through
strategic capacity building, formulation of guiding engagement frameworks and
partnerships with external stakeholders. However, the study findings revealed various
challenges that the implementing units at these case universities face. These included
institutional constraints, resource-related barriers, COVID-19 and its impacts, myths
and misconceptions about climate change. The results of the study further revealed
numerous UCE prospects for climate action like institutional commitment to
community engagement towards climate change mitigation and adaptation;
incorporation of indigenous knowledge about climate change mitigation and adaptation
in mainstream academic and collaboration programs; leveraging traditional
conversation spaces (Barazas) for UCE and pathways for sensitization; harnessing
women’s knowledge, experiences and contribution towards climate change mitigation
and adaptation practices; and community empowerment and income diversification as
a key to building climate resilient communities. The findings suggest that Universities
in African contexts should ensure institutionalization of UCE with formal engagement
structures and definite prioritization of inclusive, funded, transparent and equitable
engagement programs. The conceptualization, implementation, and sustainability of CE
programs in African contextualized Higher Education Institutions (especially
universities) should reflect indigenous epistemologies induced by African philosophies
as its core foundations.