Abstract:
In Kenya, the airline sector contributes significantly to the economy, with the Kenya
Airways alone representing 1.7% of the country's GDP and employing over 5,000
people. Despite this, Kenyan airlines face substantial challenges in maintaining
competitive performance and strategic flexibility amid evolving market dynamics and
regulatory pressures. Recent research indicates that CEO traits, such as their openness
to experience and decision-making style, can profoundly affect strategic agility—the
ability of an organization to adapt and respond to market changes swiftly. However,
there is a dearth of empirical evidence linking CEO personality traits to the strategic
agility and organizational performance of airlines in Kenya, with existing studies
providing mixed results on the broader impact of leadership personality on
performance. This study therefore sought to investigate the CEO personality on
strategic agility and organizational performance of selected aviation airlines in Kenya.
The study was guided by the following Specific Objectives; to determine the effects of
strategic insight, internal response orientation, and external response orientation on
organizational performance of selected Aviation airlines in Kenya and to determine the
moderating effect of CEO personality on the relationship between strategic insight,
internal response orientation and external response orientation on organizational
performance of selected Aviation airlines in Kenya. The study was guided by Balance
score card, dynamic capabilities and Eysenck's personality theories. The study
employed explanatory research design. The study was done at eight (8) selected
aviation airlines in Kenya. The study population included the top four (4) managers of
each selected airlines (Executive CEO, financial manager, marketing manager and
operations manager), 125 middle level managers, 160 middle level operational
managers and 185 managers on ground handling ticketing/dispatching staff from the
selected airline making a total target population of 502. The sample size for the study
was 223 respondents. The study used simple random sampling to select respondents.
This study used primary sources of data to produce quantitative information. The data
were collected from the respondents using questionnaires. Quantitative data was
analyzed by use of descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The study results
showed that strategic (β 1 =0.556, p<0.05), Internal response (β 2 =0.191, p<0.05) and
External response orientation (β 3 =0.274, p<0.05) had a positive and significant effect
on organizational performance. CEO personality had a negative and significant
moderating effect on the relationship between strategic insight (β=-1.130; p<0.05),
external response orientation (β=-0.105; p<0.05) and organizational performance. CEO
personality has a positive and significant moderating effect on the relationship between
internal response orientation (β=.192; p<0.05) and organizational performance. The
study concluded that CEO personality negatively affects the relationship between
strategic insight, external response orientation and positively enhances internal
response orientation on organizational performance. The study recommends that
Airlines should prioritize building strong customer relationships and implementing
effective feedback mechanisms to address customer concerns and improve service
quality. organizations should invest in developing leadership qualities such as charisma,
decisiveness, vision, fairness, and collaboration among CEOs. Additionally, airlines
should implement regular performance monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. Future
research could explore alternative measures or dimensions of internal response
orientation, such as organizational culture, leadership styles, or employee engagement
initiatives, to uncover their impact on organizational performance within the airline
industry.