DSpace Repository

A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Jaguga, Florence
dc.contributor.author Kiburi, Sarah Kanana
dc.contributor.author Temet, Eunice
dc.contributor.author Aalsma, Matthew C.
dc.contributor.author Ott, Mary A.
dc.contributor.author Maina, Rachel W.
dc.contributor.author Wachira, Juddy
dc.contributor.author Mostert, Cyprian
dc.contributor.author Kosgei, Gilliane
dc.contributor.author Tenge, Angeline
dc.contributor.author Atwoli, Lukoye
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-24T08:55:37Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-24T08:55:37Z
dc.date.issued 2024-10-24
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003340
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9569
dc.description.abstract Background The burden of substance use in Africa is substantial. Brief interventions (BIs) are a recom- mended public health strategy for the prevention and early intervention for substance use problems. The objective of this scoping review was to map the literature on substance use BIs in Africa, identify gaps, and provide directions for future research. Methods The scoping review was guided by the Arksey O’Malley Framework and the PRISMA-Scop- ing review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A search of five bibliographic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Professionals (CINAHL) and Cochrane Library) was conducted from inception until 1st November 2023. BIs were defined as those targeting substance use and delivered over 1–4 sessions, or interventions delivered over more than four sessions if the authors referred to them as ‘brief’. Results of the review have been summarized descriptively and organized by three broad outcomes: BI effect and feasibility; feasibility and effectiveness of training providers to deliver BIs; Other outcomes i.e. cost-effectiveness, BI adaptation and development, and knowledge attitude and practice of BIs by providers. Results Of the 80 studies that were eligible for inclusion, 68 investigated the effect and feasibility of BIs, six studies investigated the feasibility and effectiveness of training providers to deliver BIs, and six explored other outcomes. Most of the available studies had been conducted inEastern and Southern Africa. BIs were largely based on motivational interviewing and psy- choeducational principles. Overall, the BIs were reported as feasible to implement from the perspective of policy makers, providers, and the intervention recipients. Findings on the effect of BIs on substance use were mixed. Key evidence gaps emerged. There was paucity of BI research focusing on substances other than alcohol, and there was limited literature on feasibility and efficacy of BIs among youth and adolescents. Conclusion The results of this scoping review provide important directions for future substance use BI research in Africa. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PLOS en_US
dc.subject substance use in Africa en_US
dc.title A scoping review of substance use brief interventions in Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account