Abstract:
Business performance of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) not only play a significant
role in a country's economy but are essential to the economic stability of the country.
However, many challenges affect MSEs and as a result, they perform dismally leading to
high mortality rates. Despite the many studies already done in this area, little is still known
concerning the interplay of innovation types, dynamic capabilities and business
performance of SMEs, thus the need to interrogate the link between these variables.
Therefore, the focus of this study was to examine the moderating effect of dynamic
capabilities on the relationship between innovation types and business performance of
manufacturing SMEs in Kenya. Specifically, the study sought to examine the effect of
product innovation, process innovation, marketing innovation and organizational
innovation on business performance. The study examined the moderating role of dynamic
capabilities on the relationship between innovation types and business performance. The
study was anchored on Resource Based View theory and Dynamic Capabilities Theory.
The study utilized the explanatory research design and targeted 987 respondents consisting
of medium and small enterprises managers and owners. Cluster sampling, stratified
random sampling and simple random sampling technics were used to select a sample size
of 284 respondents for the study. Questionnaire was used as the data collection instrument.
Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics of frequencies and percentages, and
inferential statistics which included Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient that was used to find
out the association between innovation types constructs and business performance. Simple
Linear Regression was used to analyze the first four objectives. Multiple Regression was
tested for statistical significant effect between innovation types and business performance.
Hierarchical Regression Analysis was used to find out the moderating effect of dynamic
capabilities on the relationship between innovation types and business performance. Data
is presented in form of tables and figures. The study found a negative and insignificant
relationship between product innovation and business performance (β = -0.030, t=-0.322,
ρ = 0.748) while process innovation (β = 0.412, t= 6.413, ρ = 0.000), market innovation (β
= -0.495, t= -6.690, ρ = 0.000) and organizational innovation (β = 0.230, t= 3.167, ρ =
0.002) had significant effect on business performance. The moderator (dynamic
capabilities) was found to have a positive and insignificant effect on business performance
(β = 0.271, t =1.49, p = 0.137). The interaction effects indicate that dynamic capabilities
moderate the relationship between product innovation and business performance (β =
1.120, t = 6.038, p = .000) indicating an enhanced moderation. The interaction between
dynamic capabilities on the relationship between process innovation and business
performance (β = 0.105, t = 0.714, p = 0.476) is insignificant indicating an antagonistic
moderation. Moreover, the interaction effects indicate that dynamic capabilities moderate
the relationship between market innovation and business performance (β = -1.321, t = -
11.126, p = .000) thus, indicating an enhanced moderation. The interaction effect shows
that dynamic capabilities moderate the relationship between organizational innovation and
business performance (β = 1.128, t = 4.269, p = .000) thus indicating an enhanced
moderation. Therefore, the moderating effect of dynamic capacities gives new insights into
literature and theory in relation to the research variables. These new insights have
consequences for managers and policy makers. The study recommends that SMEs consider
implementing innovations to boost their competitiveness. Specifically, managers of SMEs
should encourage innovation within their companies by optimizing their operations by
adopting innovations that create a competitive edge in the performance of the organization.
This study contributes to the growing body of research on how innovation uptake and
organizational performance are affected by the context of developing markets.