Abstract:
The listed companies are often seen as high achievers due to their strict regulatory
compliance and effective oversight. However, this same rigorous adherence may contribute
to their challenges in the Kenyan market, where issues with board independence could be
a significant factor in their underperformance. The rigid governance structures, while
beneficial in some contexts, might hinder their adaptability and responsiveness, leading to
difficulties in navigating the unique dynamics of the Kenyan business environment. This
study investigated the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure on the
financial performance of Kenyan-listed companies. It focused on how the independence of
a company's board of directors affects this relationship. The research examined the impact
of transaction costs, reputation capital, and agency costs on financial performance, and
explored how board independence moderates these variables. The theoretical frameworks
grounding this research are Transactional Cost Theory, Agency Theory, and Stakeholder
theory. The study focused on listed companies in Kenya, comprising 64 companies across
several industries, and employed an explanatory research approach. This study used an
explanatory research approach to investigate and elucidate the causal links between
financial performance in Kenyan-listed companies and corporate governance
characteristics. This all-inclusive method produced a dataset of 693 observations. The
methodology of choice was secondary data collecting, with data sheets serving this
function. The study profiled and summarized patterns in each firm's data using descriptive
statistics, which include measures of central tendency and dispersion. It also used Stata
version 16 to do panel regression analysis to examine the type and importance of the
association between independent factors and the dependent variable. This analysis sheds
light on the impact of CSR disclosure on financial performance and how board
independence moderated this relationship. The findings indicated that transaction cost
exhibits a strong positive correlation with financial performance (r = .691, p < .001).
Reputation capital also shows a very strong positive correlation with financial performance
(r = .866, p < .001). Agency costs are significantly correlated with financial performance
(r = .841, p < .001), indicating a robust relationship. Board independence is positively
correlated with financial performance (r = .686, p < .001). Control, however, shows no
significant correlation with financial performance (r = .097, p = .449). These findings
suggest that factors such as reputation capital, agency costs, and board independence
significantly influence financial performance. The study tested three hypotheses on the
moderation effects of board independence on financial performance in Kenyan listed
companies. The hypotheses for transaction costs (R²∆ = 0.07; p = 0.02) and reputation
capital (R²∆ = 0.06; p = -0.044) were rejected, showing significant moderation, while the
hypothesis for agency costs (R²∆ = 0.04; p = 0.079) was failed to be rejected. The study
makes several recommendations for Kenyan listed companies: they should implement key
performance indicators, foster ethical corporate cultures, balance agency costs with growth
investments, adopt technology-driven process optimization, and regularly evaluate their
operations against best practices. Management should reduce transaction costs by
streamlining procedures and enhancing operational efficiency. Transparent governance is
crucial to minimizing agency costs and maintaining integrity. Theoretically, reputational
capital underscores the value of ethical behavior for long-term success, while
understanding transaction costs emphasizes resource allocation optimization. Policy-wise,
consumer protection laws safeguard reputational capital, promoting ethical business
conduct and aligning stakeholders' interests for long-term value creation. The study
recommend for future study to explore the impact of board independence on financial
performance across different sectors in Kenya to determine sector-specific dynamics.