DSpace Repository

Anthropometric measurements as predictors of hypertension in Busia, Vihiga, Trans Nzoia and Siaya counties of Western Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Andale, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Orango, Vitalis
dc.contributor.author Lwande, Gerald O.
dc.contributor.author Mwaura, Grace W.
dc.contributor.author Mugo, Richard
dc.contributor.author . Limo, Obed K
dc.contributor.author Mwangi, Ann
dc.contributor.author Kamano, Jemima H.
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-28T13:02:36Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-28T13:02:36Z
dc.date.issued 2021-07-08
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.07.21258941
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9156
dc.description.abstract Emerging data suggest a rise in the incidence rate of hypertension in many countries within Sub-Saharan Africa. This has been attributed to socioeconomic factors that have influenced diet and reduced physical activity further deranging anthropometric measurements. We assessed the predictive power of three anthropometric indicators namely: waist circumference (WC), waist to height ratio (WHtR) and body mass index (BMI) in detecting hypertension. This cross-sectional community survey was conducted in four counties within Western Kenya between October 2018 to April 2019 among 3594 adults. The participants’ sociodemographic data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and anthropometric measurements taken. We used the R-software for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis. Pearson chi-square test was used to assess the association between anthropometric measurements and hypertension while logistic regressions estimated the likelihood of hypertension. Youden method was used to identify optimal anthropometric cut-offs for sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve computation. The crude prevalence of hypertension was 23.3%, however it rose with advancement in age. Furthermore, obese individuals had a three-fold (AOR=2.64; 95% CI: 2.09, 3.35) increased likelihood of hypertension compared to those with a normal BMI. The optimal WC cut-off was 82.5cm for men and 87cm for women, an optimal WHtR of 0.47 for men and 0.55 for women; while the optimal BMI cut-off was 23.7 kg/m2 and 22.6 kg/m2 for men and women respectively. The sensitivity of WC, WHtR and BMI for men was 0.60, 0.65 and 0.39 respectively and 0.71, 0.65 and 0.78 respectively for women. BMI is the best predictor for hypertension among women but a poor predictor for men; WC had a high hypertension predictive power for both gender while WHtR is the best hypertension predictor for men. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMJ en_US
dc.subject Hypertension en_US
dc.subject Waist Circumference en_US
dc.subject BMI, en_US
dc.subject Anthropometrics en_US
dc.subject Predictors en_US
dc.title Anthropometric measurements as predictors of hypertension in Busia, Vihiga, Trans Nzoia and Siaya counties of Western Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account