DSpace Repository

Acceptability of prepayment, social solidarity and cross-subsidies in national health insurance: A mixed methods study in Western Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maritim, Beryl
dc.contributor.author Koon, Adam D.
dc.contributor.author Kimaina, Allan
dc.contributor.author Goudge, Jane
dc.date.accessioned 2024-05-08T12:09:51Z
dc.date.available 2024-05-08T12:09:51Z
dc.date.issued 2022-10-14
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.957528
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9067
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Many low- and middle-income countries are attempting to finance healthcare through voluntary membership of insurance schemes. This study examined willingness to prepay for health care, social solidarity as well as the acceptability of subsidies for the poor as factors that determine enrolment in western Kenya. Methods: This study employed a sequential mixed method design. We conducted a cross-sectional household survey (n = 1,746), in-depth household interviews (n = 36), 6 FGDs with community stakeholders and key informant interviews (n = 11) with policy makers and implementers in a single county in western Kenya. Social solidarity was defined by willingness to make contributions that would benefit people who were sicker (“risk cross- subsidization”) and poorer (“income cross-subsidization”). We also explored participants’ preferences related to contribution cost structure – e.g., flat, proportional, progressive, and exemptions for the poor. Results: Our study found high willingness to prepay for healthcare among those without insurance (87.1%) with competing priorities, low incomes, poor access, and quality of health services, lack of awareness of flexible payment options cited as barriers to enrolment. More than half of respondents expressed willingness to tolerate risk and income cross- subsidization suggesting strong social solidarity, which increased with socio- economic status (SES). Higher SES was also associated with preference for a proportional payment while lower SES with a progressive payment. Few participants, even the poor themselves, felt the poor should be exempt from any payment, due to stigma (being accused of laziness) and fear of losing power in the process of receiving care (having the right to demand care).Conclusion: Although there was a high willingness to prepay for healthcare, numerous barriers hindered voluntary health insurance enrolment in Kenya. Our findings highlight the importance of fostering and leveraging existing social solidarity to move away from flat rate contributions to allow for fairer risk and income cross-subsidization. Finally, governments should invest in robust strategies to effectively identify subsidy beneficiaries en_US
dc.description.sponsorship No. 54100113 , en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Frontiers en_US
dc.subject Social solidarity, en_US
dc.subject Health insurance en_US
dc.subject Willingness to prepay, en_US
dc.subject Informal workers, en_US
dc.title Acceptability of prepayment, social solidarity and cross-subsidies in national health insurance: A mixed methods study in Western Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account