Abstract:
Climate-smart agriculture is among long-term agricultural-based technologies invented
and developed to spearhead sustainable agricultural development by addressing food
availability and climate challenges. With this huge mandate and opportunities, the
technologies have not been adequately adopted by the target farmers. This study has
endeavored to explore how communication can be a potent tool to drive effective and
efficient execution of agricultural programs on climate-smart and the extent to which it
influences the utilization of the technologies among farmers in West Pokot, Kenya. The
study is derived from the implementation of the Kenya Climate Smart Agriculture Project
(KCSAP), a World Bank‘s five-year project (2017 – 2022) implemented in 24 counties
among them West Pokot. The objectives of the study were to find out the types of
communication that have been adopted by agricultural researchers to enhance the
utilization of climate-smart agricultural technologies; assess the extent to which farmers
in West Pokot County have adopted climate-smart agriculture based on information
received from agricultural researchers; assess communication barriers and explore
communication interventions that can be put in place to improve utilization of climate-
smart agricultural technologies among farmers in West Pokot County. This study is
grounded on the diffusion of innovation theory, technology acceptance model, and
knowledge-based theory. The study employed a pragmatism mixed method approach;
where both quantitative and qualitative approaches were utilized sequentially. 494
farmers were sampled for quantitative data while 29 key informants were sampled for
qualitative data. Quantitative data was collected by use of questionnaires while
qualitative data was collected through conducting interviews. ANOVA analysis showed
significance, an implication of the linear relationship between the utilization of climate-
smart agricultural technologies (UCAT) and the independent variables. An analysis of the
coefficients revealed that on regression, the variables were significant (p<0.05) except
interventions of communication (p>0.05). From qualitative data, it was established that
language barriers, poor communication techniques, inadequate information centers, and
limited numbers of extension officers in the field for face-to-face communication were
some of the communication barriers in the field while some of the interventions proposed
by the key informants included; improving two-way communication, use of vernacular
language in radio stations and increase of face-to-face communication. The study
concludes that, while there was an emerging appreciation of climate-smart agriculture
and the need for its adoption by West Pokot farmers, their adoption was mainly
constrained by poor means of communication such as language barrier and technical
terms used by scientists to communicate to farmers. The study therefore recommends
agricultural communication agents should package their messages in a local language
frequently used and understood by farmers in West Pokot County. Climate Smart
Technologies published in English should be translated into local vernacular language,
further information can be passed through local radio stations that speak local language
that can easily be understood by the farmers. Different approaches of communication and
extension are proposed as flagship models that can be implemented through agricultural
research institutions, private extension partners, and in some cases, through a partnership
with local awareness creation organizations.