DSpace Repository

Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Esamai, Fabian
dc.contributor.author Shukla, Vivek
dc.contributor.author Musaku, Mwenechanya
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-18T16:15:03Z
dc.date.available 2023-12-18T16:15:03Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://karger.com/neo/article-abstract/doi/10.1159/000534777/870523/Neonatal-Respiratory-Support-Utilization-in-Low?redirectedFrom=fulltext
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8605
dc.description.abstract Background: Newborns with hypoxemia often require life-saving respiratory support. In low-resource settings, it is unknown if respiratory support is delivered more frequently to term infants or preterm infants. We hypothesized that in a registry-based birth cohort in 105 geographic areas in seven low- and middle-income countries, more term newborns received respiratory support than preterm newborns. Methods: This is a hypothesis-driven observational study based on prospectively collected data from the Maternal and Newborn Health Registry of the NICHD Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research. Eligible infants enrolled in the registry were live-born between 22 and 44 weeks gestation with a birth weight ≥400 g and born from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018. Frequency data were obtained to report the number of term and preterm infants who received treatment with oxygen only, CPAP, or mechanical ventilation. Test for trends over time were conducted using robust Poisson regression. Results: 177,728 (86.3%) infants included in this study were term, and 28,249 (13.7%) were preterm. A larger number of term infants (n = 5,108) received respiratory support compared to preterm infants (n = 3,287). Receipt of each mode of respiratory support was more frequent in term infants. The proportion of preterm infants who received respiratory support (11.6%) was higher than the proportion of term infants receiving respiratory support (2.9%, p < 0.001). The rate of provision of respiratory support varied between sites. Conclusions: Respiratory support was more frequently used in term infants expected to be at low risk for respiratory disorders compared to preterm infants. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Neonatology en_US
dc.subject Neonatal en_US
dc.subject Respiratory en_US
dc.title Neonatal Respiratory Support Utilization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Registry-Based Observational Study en_US
dc.title.alternative ; Elwyn Chomba; Archana Patel; Patricia L. Hibberd; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Lester Figueroa; Manolo Mazariegos; Nancy F. Krebs; Shivaprasad S. Goudar; Richard Derman; Edward A. Liechty; Sheri Bucher; Sarah Saleem; Robert L. Goldenberg; Adrien Lokangaka; Antoinette Tshefu; Carl L. Bose; Marion Koso-Thomas; Sylvia Tan; Tracy Nolen; Elizabeth M. McClure; Waldemar A. Carlo en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account