Abstract:
ncluding watershed degradation. The major causes of watershed degradation are extensive
deforestation and poor soil and water conservation measures. River flow discharge is
influenced by LULC changes, soil and water conservation measures and managerial
practices applied by farmers and further compounded by the growing human population.
This study was conducted in Chepkaitit and Moiben Rivers‘ watershed located along
Trans Nzoia, Uasin Gishu and Elgeyo-Marakwet counties in Kenya. The specific objectives
were to establish LULC changes in the years1980, 2000 and 2020; so as to determine how
change in LULC types influences river flow and to analyze the kinds and level of soil and
water conservation measures applied by residents. The common property Theory was
used to guide the study. The study used descriptive and correlational research design and
the data was both primary and secondary. The target population under study was 96,746
household heads and a sample size of 383 household heads was used to fill in the
paperless questionnaires developed and deployed in the kobo toolbox. Stratified random
sampling technique was employed for the survey and the cleaned data was analyzed using
SPSS software. The LULC change analysis used data from Landsat satellite imagery
downloaded from United States Geological Survey website while the Soil and Water
Assessment Tool model was used to quantify the impacts of river discharge variability
under base scenario (1980 LULC), scenario 2 (100% agriculture LULC) and scenario 3
(100% Forest). The SWAT model used weather data downloaded from the ―Global
Weather data for SWAT‖ website and DEM (slope data) downloaded from USGS website
while model output calibration used SWAT-CUP. The study found out that there were
great changes on LULC on the study area within the period of study. The natural forest,
bush land and wetland had reduced by 13%, 95% and 67% respectively while cropland
and plantation forest had increased by 69% and 32% respectively. The study also found
out that changes in the LULC types significantly influenced the river discharge with R 2 of
0.89 at p= 0.00001 with a significant level of 0.05. The change in river discharge was
more pronounced in April where scenario 2 river discharge varied by -28.51% and
19.57% for scenario 3. The research further established the soil and water
conservation measures as contours, gabions, minimum tillage, tree planting and strip
cropping. The study concluded that there were significant changes in LULC types in the
study periods, the LULC changes influence on river discharge was significant with
synchronized flow under forest cover and all farmers were applying some form of water
and soil conservation measures in their farms. The study recommends that afforestation
be prioritized especially in the steep slopes, while the riparian vegetation should be
conserved as required by the policy guidelines and farmers to be encouraged to practice
conservation agriculture.