Abstract:
This research assessed the effectiveness of public participation in county government
development projects, in Kericho County. The researcher was concerned that the legal
and institutional framework in Kericho County, has failed to guarantee the full
attainment of the goals of the 2010 constitution, on public participation. The specific
objectives were: to assess the modes of participation by the public in county
development projects; to analyze the extent of involvement of the public in county
development projects; and to investigate the level of access to information for the
public concerning county development projects. The study adopted The Rational
Choice Model by Adam Smith to be able to explain participation of individuals in
county projects. The study utilized concurrent mixed research design. The researcher
deployed purposive sampling as part of cluster sampling. Primary data collection was
executed using questionnaires with both structured and unstructured questions, and
interview schedules. Secondary data was obtained through document and reports
analysis. A selected sample of 250 respondents from an infinite population of
approximately 375,668 (IEBC Voter register 2017) citizen aged 18years and above
was used in the study. 10 respondents were involved in the interview schedule. The
treatment and analysis of data in this research was done considering the research
questions. Data analysis was done using SPSS program which gave two descriptive
statistics; frequencies, and percentages. The results were presented in tables and used
to discuss the findings. Qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. The
study established that despite the various modes of participation, the most used mode
was election of project leaders which yielded a response of 106 or 45.5% of the total
response; it was noted that, most people may not be aware of the importance of their
participation, and thus could not embrace these modes. The study also found out that
public involvement at various levels of project development may be quite low, with
the highest being project identification and implementation both of which yielded
about twenty-five percent 25.4% response. The study further established that the main
sources of information on county development projects are barazas (public meetings)
that were affirmed by about fifty-one percent 50.6% respondents; social
media/internet/website was affirmed by 104 about forty-five percent 44.6% of the
respondents; other sources were underutilized. The study concludes that, participation
in development projects is below the desired levels. This study recommends that,
Kericho County need to improve public participation in development projects in all
sectors and even more, ensure that it achieves greater positive impact.