DSpace Repository

Examining the responsiveness of the national health insurance fund to people living with hypertension and diabetes in Kenya: a qualitative study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Oyando, Robinson
dc.contributor.author Were, Vincent
dc.contributor.author Willis, Ruth
dc.contributor.author Koros, Hillary
dc.contributor.author Kamano, Jemima H
dc.contributor.author Naanyu, Violet
dc.contributor.author Etyang, Anthony
dc.contributor.author Mugo, Richard
dc.contributor.author Murphy, Adrianna
dc.contributor.author Nolte, Ellen
dc.contributor.author Perel, Pablo
dc.contributor.author Barasa, Edwine
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-17T12:13:01Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-17T12:13:01Z
dc.date.issued 2023-06-15
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7808
dc.description.abstract Objectives To assess the responsiveness of the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) Supa Cover benefit package to the needs of individuals with diabetes and hypertension in Kenya. Design, setting and participants We carried out a qualitative study and collected data using key informant interviews (n=39) and focus group discussions (n=4) in two purposively selected counties in Western Kenya. Study participants were drawn from NHIF officials, county government officials, health facility managers, healthcare workers and individuals with hypertension and diabetes who were enrolled in NHIF. We analysed data using a thematic approach. Results Study participants reported that the NHIF Supa Cover benefit package expanded access to services for people living with hypertension and diabetes. However, the NHIF members and healthcare workers had inadequate awareness of the NHIF service entitlements. The NHIF benefit package inadequately covered the range of services needed by people living with hypertension and diabetes and the benefits package did not prioritise preventive and promotive services. Sometimes patients were discriminated against by healthcare providers who preferred cash-paying patients, and some NHIF- empanelled health facilities had inadequate structural inputs essential for quality of care. Study participants felt that the NHIF premium for the general scheme was unaffordable, and NHIF members faced additional out-of- pocket costs because of additional payments for services not available or covered. Conclusion Whereas NHIF has reduced financial barriers for hypertension and diabetes patients, to enhance its responsiveness to patient needs, NHIF should implement mechanisms to increase benefit package awareness among members and providers. In addition, preventive and promotive services should be included in NHIF’s benefits package and mechanisms to monitor and hold contracted providers accountable should be strengthened. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship MR/T023538/1. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMJ en_US
dc.subject National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) en_US
dc.subject Responsiveness en_US
dc.subject Diabetes and hypertension en_US
dc.title Examining the responsiveness of the national health insurance fund to people living with hypertension and diabetes in Kenya: a qualitative study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account