DSpace Repository

Household beliefs about malaria testing and treatment in Western Kenya: the role of health worker adherence to malaria test results

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Saran, Indrani
dc.contributor.author Maffioli, Elisa M.
dc.contributor.author Menya, Diana
dc.contributor.author Prudhomme O’Meara, Wendy
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-05T07:40:13Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-05T07:40:13Z
dc.date.issued 2017-08-22
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7736
dc.description.abstract Background: Although use of malaria diagnostic tests has increased in recent years, health workers often prescribe anti-malarial drugs to individuals who test negative for malaria. This study investigates how health worker adherence to malaria case management guidelines influences individuals’ beliefs about whether their illness was malaria, and their confidence in the effectiveness of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). Methods: A survey was conducted with 2065 households in Western Kenya about a household member’s treatment actions for a recent febrile illness. The survey also elicited the individual’s (or their caregiver’s) beliefs about the illness and about malaria testing and treatment. Logistic regressions were used to test the association between these beliefs and whether the health worker adhered to malaria testing and treatment guidelines. Results: Of the 1070 individuals who visited a formal health facility during their illness, 82% were tested for malaria. ACT rates for malaria-positive and negative individuals were 89 and 49%, respectively. Overall, 65% of individuals/ caregivers believed that the illness was “very likely” malaria. Individuals/caregivers had higher odds of saying that the illness was “very likely” malaria when the individual was treated with ACT, and this was the case both among indi- viduals not tested for malaria [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.65 7.10], P = 0.001] and among individuals tested for malaria, regardless of their test result. In addition, 72% of ACT-takers said the drug was “very likely” effective in treating malaria. However, malaria-negative individuals who were treated with ACT had lower odds of saying that the drugs were “very likely” effective than ACT-takers who were not tested or who tested positive for malaria (AOR 0.29, 95% CI [0.13 0.63], P = 0.002). Conclusion: Individuals/caregivers were more likely to believe that the illness was malaria when the patient was treated with ACT, regardless of their test result. Moreover, malaria-negative individuals treated with ACT had lower confidence in the drug than other individuals who took ACT. These results suggest that ensuring health worker adher- ence to malaria case management guidelines will not only improve ACT targeting, but may also increase patient/ caregivers’ confidence in malaria testing and treatment. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship R01AI110478 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.subject Malaria en_US
dc.subject Household beliefs en_US
dc.subject Targeting en_US
dc.subject Rapid diagnostic tests en_US
dc.subject Artemisinin-combination therapy en_US
dc.subject Treatment-seeking behavior en_US
dc.subject Case management en_US
dc.title Household beliefs about malaria testing and treatment in Western Kenya: the role of health worker adherence to malaria test results en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account