DSpace Repository

Parental experiences of childhood cancer treatment in Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Njuguna, F.
dc.contributor.author Mostert, S.
dc.contributor.author Seijffert, A.
dc.contributor.author Musimbi, J
dc.contributor.author Langat, S.
dc.contributor.author Burgt, R. H. M. van der
dc.contributor.author Skiles, J.
dc.contributor.author Sitaresmi, M. N.
dc.contributor.author Ven, P. M. van de
dc.contributor.author Kaspers, G. J. L.
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-04T08:57:50Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-04T08:57:50Z
dc.date.issued 2014-10-17
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7729
dc.description.abstract Purpose Our study explores socioeconomic, treatment-relat- ed, and psychological experiences of parents during cancer treatment of their children at an academic hospital in Kenya. Methods This cross-sectional study used semi-structured questionnaires. Parents whose children came for cancer treat- ment consecutively between November 2012 and April 2013 were interviewed. Results Between 2012 and 2013, 115 oncology patients attended the hospital and 75 families (response rate 65 %) were interviewed. Cancer treatment resulted in financial dif- ficulties (89 %). More information about cancer and treatment was required (88 %). More contact with doctors was needed (83 %). At diagnosis, cancer was perceived as curable (63 %). However, parents were told by health-care providers that most children with cancer die (49 %). Parents had difficulties with understanding doctors’ vocabulary (48 %). Common reasons to miss hospital appointments were travel costs (52 %) and hospital costs (28 %). Parents (95 %) used complementary alternative treatment (CAM) for their children. Health-care providers told parents not to use CAM (49 %). Parents had not discussed their CAM use with doctors (71 %). Community members isolated families because their child had cancer (25 %), believed that child was bewitched (57 %), advised to use CAM (61 %), and stopped conventional treatment (45 %). Some families (15 %) never disclosed the child’s illness to community members. Parents shared experiences with other parents at the ward (97 %) and would otherwise not understand the disease and its treatment (87 %). Conclusions Parents suffer financial hardships and are dissatis- fied with doctors’ communication regarding their children’s con- dition. CAM is very commonly used. Doctors need to improve their communication skills and discuss CAM more openly. Can- cer programs should include more support for parents: financial assistance, a facility where parents and children can stay during the course of therapy, and parent support groups. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.subject Childhood cancer en_US
dc.subject Treatment-related experiences en_US
dc.subject Socioeconomic experiences en_US
dc.subject Psychological experiences en_US
dc.subject Physician communication . en_US
dc.subject Complementary alternative treatment en_US
dc.title Parental experiences of childhood cancer treatment in Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account