Moi University Open Access Repository

Development of standard indicators to assess use of electronic health record systems implemented in low-and medium-income countries

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ngugi, Philomena
dc.contributor.author Babic, Ankica
dc.contributor.author Kariuki, James
dc.contributor.author Santas, Xenophon
dc.contributor.author Naanyu, Violet
dc.contributor.author Were, Martin C
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-01T09:11:11Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-01T09:11:11Z
dc.date.issued 2021-01-11
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6587
dc.description.abstract Background Electronic Health Record Systems (EHRs) are being rolled out nationally in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) yet assessing actual system usage remains a challenge. We employed a nominal group technique (NGT) process to systematically develop high quality indicators for evaluating actual usage of EHRs in LMICs. Methods An initial set of 14 candidate indicators were developed by the study team adapting the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting indicators for mat. A multidisciplinary team of 10 experts was convened in a two-day NGT workshop in Kenya to systematically evaluate, rate (using Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) criteria), prioritize, refine, and identify new indicators. NGT steps included introduction to candidate indicators, silent indicator ranking, round-robin indicator rating, and silent generation of new indicators. 5-point Likert scale was used in rating the candidate indicators against the SMART components. Results Candidate indicators were rated highly on SMART criteria (4.05/5). NGT participants settled on 15 final indicators, categorized as system use (4); data quality (3), system interoperability (3), and reporting (5). Data entry statistics, systems uptime, and EHRs variable concor dance indicators were rated highest. Conclusion This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for determining EHRs use and provides LMICs with a multidimensional tool for assessing suc cess of EHRs implementations. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PLOS ONE en_US
dc.subject Standard indicators en_US
dc.subject Electronic health record systems en_US
dc.title Development of standard indicators to assess use of electronic health record systems implemented in low-and medium-income countries en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account