DSpace Repository

The relationships between resilience, care environment, and social-psychological factors in orphaned and separated adolescents in Western Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sutherland, Sarah C
dc.contributor.author Shannon, Harry S
dc.contributor.author Ayuku, David
dc.contributor.author Streiner, David L
dc.contributor.author Saarela, Olli
dc.contributor.author Atwoli, Lukoye
dc.contributor.author Braitstein, Paula
dc.date.accessioned 2022-06-27T12:19:34Z
dc.date.available 2022-06-27T12:19:34Z
dc.date.issued 2022-04-29
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6467
dc.description.abstract The relationships between care environment, resilience, and social factors in orphaned and separated adolescents and youths (OSAY) in western Kenya are complex and under-studied.Survey responses from OSAY living in Charitable Children’s Institutes (CCI) and family based care settings (FBS) in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya were used to examine the associations between 1) care environment and resilience; 2) care environment and factors thought to promote resili ence (e.g. social, family, and peer support); and 3) resilience and these same resilience-promoting factors, using multivariable linear and logistic regressions. This cross-sectional study included 1202 OSAY (50.4% female) aged 10–26 (mean = 16; SD = 3.5). The mean resilience score in CCIs was 71 (95%CI = 69–73) vs. 64 (95%CI = 62– 66) in FBS. OSAY in CCIs had higher resilience (β = 7.67; 95% CI = 5.26–10.09), social support (β = 0.26; 95%CI = 0.14–0.37), and peer support (β = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.64–1.17) than those in FBS. OSAY in CCIs were more likely to volunteer than those in FBS (OR = 3.72; 95%CI = 1.80–7.68), except in the male subgroup. Family (β = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.24–0.60), social (β = 4.19; 95%CI = 2.53–5.85), and peer (β = 2.13; 95%CI = 1.44–2.83) relationships were positively associated with resilience in all analyses. Volunteering was positively associated with resilience (β = 5.85; 95%CI = 1.51–10.19). The factor most strongly related to resilience in both fully adjusted models was peer support. This study found a strong relationship between care environment and resilience. Care environment and resilience each independently demonstrated strong relationships with peer support, social support, and participating in volunteer activities. Resilience also had a strong relationship with familial support. These data suggest that resilience can be developed through strategic supports to this vulnerable population en_US
dc.description.sponsorship R01HD060478; en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Taylor and francis group en_US
dc.subject Resilience en_US
dc.subject Orphans en_US
dc.subject Social support en_US
dc.subject Environment; peer en_US
dc.title The relationships between resilience, care environment, and social-psychological factors in orphaned and separated adolescents in Western Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account