DSpace Repository

Proactive prevention: Act now to disrupt the impending non-communicable disease crisis in low-burden populations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Njuguna, Benson
dc.contributor.author Fletcher, Sara L
dc.contributor.author Akwanalo, Constantine
dc.contributor.author Asante, Kwaku Poku
dc.contributor.author Baumann, Ana
dc.contributor.author Brown, Angela
dc.contributor.author Davila-Roman, Victor G
dc.contributor.author Dickhaus, Julia
dc.contributor.author Fort, Meredith
dc.contributor.author Lwelunmor, Juliet
dc.contributor.author Irazola, Vilma
dc.contributor.author Mohan, Sailesh
dc.contributor.author Mutabazi, Vincent
dc.contributor.author Newsome, Brad
dc.contributor.author Ogedegbe, Olugbenga
dc.contributor.author Pastakia, Sonak D
dc.contributor.author K Peprah, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.author Plange-Rhule, Jacob
dc.contributor.author Roth, Gregory
dc.contributor.author Shrestha, Archana
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-25T07:36:06Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-25T07:36:06Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12-01
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6125
dc.description.abstract Non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention efforts have traditionally targeted high-risk and high-burden populations. We propose an alteration in prevention efforts to also include emphasis and focus on low-risk populations, predominantly younger individuals and low prevalence populations. We refer to this approach as “proactive prevention.” This emphasis is based on the priority to put in place policies, programs, and infrastructure that can disrupt the epidemiological transition to develop NCDs among these groups, thereby averting future NCD crises. Proactive prevention strategies can be classified, and their implementation pri oritized, based on a 2-dimensional assessment: impact and feasibility. Thus, potential inter ventions can be categorized into a 2-by-2 matrix: high impact/high feasibility, high impact/ low feasibility, low impact/high feasibility, and low impact/low feasibility. We propose thathigh impact/high feasibility interventions are ready to be implemented (act), while high impact/low feasibility interventions require efforts to foster buy-in first. Low impact/high feasibility interventions need to be changed to improve their impact while low impact/low feasibility might be best re-designed in the context of limited resources. Using this framework, policy makers, public health experts, and other stakeholders can more effectively prioritize and leverage limited resources in an effort to slow or prevent the evolving global NCD crisis. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher PLOS ONE en_US
dc.subject Non-communicable disease en_US
dc.subject Low-burden populations en_US
dc.title Proactive prevention: Act now to disrupt the impending non-communicable disease crisis in low-burden populations en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account