Abstract:
The background to this study concerns innovations in medical education curricula and
changing health care needs that require constant changes in medical school curricula.
Innovative medical curricula provide an opportunity to study perceived competence of
educators in innovative medical curriculum planning and development. Competency
of educators could be related to innovative medical curriculum planning and
development as a making process. The objective of the study was to investigate and
determine the competency perception of medical educators in innovative medical
curriculum planning and development. The study was a cross-sectional, quantitative
and descriptive survey design, conducted at Moi University, College of Health
Sciences. The SPICES model on innovative medical curriculum, (Harden, 1984) was
the theoretical framework that guided the innovative study. Harden’s ten questions to
ask when planning an innovative medical curriculum (Harden, 1986) was the
conceptual framework that guided the research process.
The methodology involved all educators in the College of Health Sciences and a pretested questionnaire was used to collect data from participants. Quantitative data were
collected and analysis was done via SPSS Version 16 for windows. Presentation of
data was done using frequency tables. In addressing the research question,
respondents were asked to state “What effect does educator’s perceived lack of
competence in curriculum planning and development have on an innovative medical
curriculum making process”. The study Measured competency perception of
educators on innovative medical curriculum planning and development as a process.
In the Results, a total of 139 educators participated with 92 (66%) returned, 11 (12%)
incomplete and 81 (58%) valid were analysed. Major findings indicate that, while a
higher proportion (60.0%) of educators depicts some competence on innovative
medical curriculum planning and development, significant proportion (40.0%) exhibit
incompetence in developing and implementing PBL, developing curriculum resources
and assessment instruments. Significant proportions (30%) were not well equipped in
identifying and aligning essential competency domains, management of informatics,
critical thinking and research.
It was concluded that there is a significant relationship between lack of educator’s
competence in curriculum development and innovative medical curriculum planning
and development making process. 87.6% of medical educators strongly perceived that
lack of educator’s competence on curriculum development has effect on innovative
medical curriculum making process
Recommendations are that, regular trainings, seminars and conferences on innovative
medical curricula issues are recommended for educators. Prospective studies be done
to determine relationships between incompetence in innovative medical curriculum
planning and development and teaching and learning.