Abstract:
Background: Malnutrition occurs due to deficiencies, excesses or imbalance in
essential nutrients. Anthropometry is objective and forms the basis for diagnosis and
classification. Various nutritional classification methods have been adopted; however,
the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the use of weight for height and
Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) because of their objectivity. Previous
studies have reported infrequent nutritional status assessment and classification. This
could lead to missed cases, delayed intervention and negative impact on patient
outcomes.
Objectives: To describe the nutritional assessment practices and barriers to
assessment of nutritional status among children aged 6-59 months seen at Moi
Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH).
Methods: This study adopted a cross-sectional mixed method sequential design
among children hospitalized at MTRH pediatric medical wards between January to
June 2017. A total of 322 children aged 6-59 months were sampled systematically
from the pediatric wards while a stratified sampling technique was used to recruit the
healthcare workers in the pediatric wards. Anthropometric measurements were taken
from all the sampled children and their clinical charts reviewed. Key-informant
interviews were conducted among sampled nurses and nutritionists, followed by three
focus group discussion sessions with the clinicians to evaluate reasons behind the
current nutritional assessment practices. Quantitative data was analyzed to determine
the proportion of children correctly classified, anthropometric measurements taken
and their associated factors using descriptive (median, frequencies and proportions)
and inferential (Pearson chi-square test) statistical techniques at 95% confidence
interval. Qualitative data was transcribed and analyzed thematically on N-Vivo
version 12 software.
Results: Majority of the children 184 (57.1 %) were male, 191 (59.3%) were aged
between 6-24 months with 293 (91%) of them being admitted for the first time.
Weight was taken among all the children sampled while height (17.1%) and MUAC
(15.5%) were infrequently measured. Wasting and edema were significantly
associated with MUAC and height measurements (p-value <0.001). The most
common form of malnutrition was severe acute malnutrition 68 (21.2%). Healthcare
workers classified the nutritional status of 67 (20.8%) children of whom 55 (82.1%)
were correctly classified based on WHZ scores. The reasons for lack of nutritional
assessment and classification of all admitted children given by healthcare workers
included: insufficient equipment, high number of patients and inadequate in-service
training.
Conclusions: All children had their weight taken while height and MUAC were not
routinely done. Nutritional status was rarely classified however most of those
classified had it appropriately done. Low levels of nutritional status assessment were
attributed to inadequate equipment, high number of children and inadequate training
of staff.
Recommendations: Routine nutritional assessment and classification should be done
for all children admitted at MTRH. There is need to provide adequate nutritional
assessment equipment and training of staff.