DSpace Repository

Newton Cote’s Quadrature Method versus Stirling’s Quadrature Method

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Yamai, Benjamin M.
dc.contributor.author Kweyu, Cleophas M.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-08-17T06:12:46Z
dc.date.available 2021-08-17T06:12:46Z
dc.date.issued 2013-12
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5024
dc.description.abstract In this paper we make a comparison between the Newton’s Cote’s quadrature method and Stirling quadrature method. The numerical quadrature rules related to the Stirling interpolation polynomial are developed as opposed to the commonly used Newton’s interpolation polynomial. This is done for the case n = 1 and n = 2. The Newton’s Cote’s and Stirling’s quadrature methods are compared by making good use of well known integrals for the two cases n = 1 and n = 2. It is found that the Newton Cote’s formula provides better accuracy than the Stirling’s quadrature formula. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher American Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences en_US
dc.subject Numerical quadrature en_US
dc.subject Interpolation en_US
dc.subject Forward difference operator en_US
dc.subject Central difference operator en_US
dc.title Newton Cote’s Quadrature Method versus Stirling’s Quadrature Method en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account