Abstract:
Globally, agribusiness is a critical driver of economic growth with strong multiplier
effects. In Africa the benefits of agribusiness are highly constrained and yet there
exists potential in agribusiness incubation and institutional support that act as a
conduit to secure livelihoods. The main objective of the study was to assess the
implications of agribusiness incubation and institutional support on livelihood
security in Bungoma County. The specific objectives were to: examine the effect of
physical capital for agribusiness incubation on livelihood security; evaluate the
impact of financial capital for agribusiness incubation on livelihood security; assess
the influence of social capital for agribusiness incubation on livelihood security, and
determine the mediating effect of institutional support on agribusiness incubation
capitals and livelihood security. The study was guided by the DFID Livelihood
Framework. Pragmatic paradigm was employed in the study. A cross-sectional
analysis of Bungoma North, Kanduyi, Bumula, Mt Elgon and Webuye West sub-
counties, with a total household population of 194,513 was done. Sub-counties were
purposively sampled forming the clusters of the study. Simple random sampling was
applied to select a sample size of 399 households, and purposively selected, 23 key
informants and 10 FGDs. Data was collected using questionnaires, observation
schedules, document reviews and interview guides. Qualitative data was thematically
analyzed and presented as narrations. Descriptive statistics was analyzed through
frequencies, percentages and means. Inferential statistics employed ANOVA, Chi-
square test, and logistic model. The findings show that agribusiness productivity is
constrained by the small land parcels (77.1% own below 3ha), pests and diseases
(95.1%), means of bulk transportation (94.5% rely on motorcycles), and storage
(58.8%). Crop production accrues low returns (80.7% earn below Ksh 20,000) with
the inability of households to meet credit requirements or access external markets.
Credit access and welfare are significant predictors of membership to a social group
{χ2 (1, 367) =4.879, p=0.027, <0.05} and {χ2 (1,367) =27.679, p=0.000}
respectively. Market prices and bureaucracy were major market constraints {F
(4,366) = 5.775, P= 0.000} and {F (4,366) = 3.425, P = 0.009} at the 0.05 alpha level
respectively. Minimal impact accrued from the financial capital mediated by
institutional support (β =.820, p=0.465). In conclusion, integrated capital oriented
strategies and policies are essential in reducing risks and building resilience among
agro entrepreneurs , to achieve a sustained increase in production. Institutional
support is critical to the optimal agribusiness transformation and mobilization of the
agribusiness capitals to enhance productivity, comparative advantage and
competitiveness. The study recommends
institutional support efforts to be
harmonized with the community‟s inherent potential for the attainment of the desired
livelihood security. The adoption of a holistic approach is critical for addressing the
physical, financial and social agribusiness capital needs concurrently.