| dc.description.abstract |
In most of the Maasai lands in Kenya, increasing human–wildlife conflicts threaten wildlife resources and conservation. This article presents data from interviews of Kuku Group Ranch residents, which were conducted to understand residents’ relationships with, and opinions of, wildlife and land use. Respondents supported agriculture expansion, which is regarded as more profitable than pastoralism or conservation. They also supported land subdivision into individually owned property, as opposed to communal ownership. Although a majority of residents still favors wildlife conservation, they are opposed to free wildlife use of their land. Support for wildlife conservation was dependent on benefits received. Losses from problem animals, lack of compensation for these losses, and lack of community involvement in wildlife conservation were major sources of local resentment. Without an urgent redress, wildlife may be excluded from Maasai lands either by direct persecution or incompatible land use changes. |
en_US |