DSpace Repository

Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and safety of Rhus vulgaris (Anacardiaceae) extracts

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Mutuku, Angela
dc.contributor.author Mwamburi, Lizzy
dc.contributor.author Keter, Lucia
dc.contributor.author Ondicho, Joyce
dc.contributor.author Korir, Richard
dc.contributor.author Kuria, James
dc.contributor.author Chemweno, Timothy
dc.contributor.author Mwitari, Peter
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-07T07:30:44Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-07T07:30:44Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3726
dc.description.abstract Oral infections are the most prevalent diseases in man. The Rhus family has been found to have antimicrobial, antimalarial, and anti-inflammatory properties. Few studies have been done on Rhus vulgaris Meikle. A study was conducted to determine the effect of Rhus vulgaris Meikle stem bark extracts against selected oral pathogenic microorganisms and the safety of the extracts in vitro and in vivo. Methods: Methanol:dichloromethane (1:1), methanol and aqueous extracts were tested for bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Cytotoxicity of the active extracts was determined using Vero E6 cell lines while safety was evaluated in mice and rats. Phytochemical screening was performed on the methanol extracts. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests were performed using IBM SPSS statistics 20.0 for antimicrobial assay and acute toxicity testing. Oneway ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests were conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.0 for cytotoxicity assay. Results: Methanol extract of Rhus vulgaris showed significant antimicrobial activity against MRSA (12.00 ± 0.00 mm; pvalue of < 0.005; Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of 0.391mg/ml; Minimum Bactericidal Concentration of 1.563 mg/ml). The extract were not cytotoxic at 100 μg/ml which was the highest tested concentration. In acute dermal irritation testing, the methanol extract resulted in mild irritation with erythema and flaking that cleared within 8 days. There were no observable adverse effects from oral administration of the extracts (acute oral toxicity testing) at concentrations of 50 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg. Tannins, saponins, flavonoids, terpenoids, glycosides, alkaloids and phenols were detected in the methanol extract. Conclusions: Antimicrobial activity of R. vulgaris extracts supports its traditional use as a toothbrush. Cytotoxicity demonstrated by the extracts as well as the mild skin irritation warrants further study before R. vulgaris can be recommended for the development of effective and safe mouthwashes. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship , en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC en_US
dc.subject Rhus vulgaris en_US
dc.subject Antimicrobial en_US
dc.subject Antifungal en_US
dc.subject Cytotoxicity en_US
dc.subject Acute toxicity en_US
dc.subject Plant extracts en_US
dc.title Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity and safety of Rhus vulgaris (Anacardiaceae) extracts en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account