DSpace Repository

Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
dc.contributor.author Stolka, Kristen B.
dc.contributor.author Koso-Thomas, Marion
dc.contributor.author Esamai, Fabian
dc.contributor.author Chomba, Elwyn
dc.contributor.author Garces, Ana
dc.contributor.author Althabe, Fernando
dc.contributor.author Carlo, Weldemar A.
dc.contributor.author Goldenberg, Robert L.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-31T06:55:13Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-31T06:55:13Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S2
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3451
dc.description.abstract Background To describe quantitative data quality monitoring and performance metrics adopted by the Global Network’s (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR), a maternal and perinatal population-based registry (MPPBR) based in low and middle income countries (LMICs). Methods Ongoing prospective, population-based data on all pregnancy outcomes within defined geographical locations participating in the GN have been collected since 2008. Data quality metrics were defined and are implemented at the cluster, site and the central level to ensure data quality. Quantitative performance metrics are described for data collected between 2010 and 2013. Results Delivery outcome rates over 95% illustrate that all sites are successful in following patients from pregnancy through delivery. Examples of specific performance metric reports illustrate how both the metrics and reporting process are used to identify cluster-level and site-level quality issues and illustrate how those metrics track over time. Other summary reports (e.g. the increasing proportion of measured birth weight compared to estimated and missing birth weight) illustrate how a site has improved quality over time. Conclusion High quality MPPBRs such as the MNHR provide key information on pregnancy outcomes to local and international health officials where civil registration systems are lacking. The MNHR has measures in place to monitor data collection procedures and improve the quality of data collected. Sites have increasingly achieved acceptable values of performance metrics over time, indicating improvements in data quality, but the quality control program must continue to evolve to optimize the use of the MNHR to assess the impact of community interventions in research protocols in pregnancy and perinatal health. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer en_US
dc.subject Maternal en_US
dc.subject Newborn en_US
dc.title Data quality monitoring and performance metrics of a prospective, population-based observational study of maternal and newborn health in low resource settings en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account