DSpace Repository

Qualitative exploration of perceivedbenefits of care and barriers influencingHIV care in trans Nzoia, Kenya

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Naanyu, V.
dc.contributor.author Ruff, J.
dc.contributor.author Goodrich, S.
dc.contributor.author Spira, T.
dc.contributor.author Bateganya, M.
dc.contributor.author Toroitich-Ruto, C.
dc.contributor.author Otieno-Nyunya, B.
dc.contributor.author Siika, A. M.
dc.contributor.author Wools-Kaloustian, K.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-08-14T09:28:21Z
dc.date.available 2020-08-14T09:28:21Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05236-z
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3435
dc.description.abstract Background:Substantial efforts have been made to ensure people living with HIV (PLHIV) are linked to and retained in care but many challenges deter care utilization. We report perceived benefits of seeking HIV care and barriers to HIV care that were identified through a formative assessment conducted to advise the development ofan alternative care model to deliver antiretroviral treatment therapy (ART) in Trans Nzoia County, Kenya.Methods:Data were collected in 2015 through key informant interviews (KIIs), in-depth interviews (IDIs), and focus group discussions (FGDs). The study involved 55 participants of whom 53% were female. Ten KIIs provided community contextual information and viewpoints on the HIV epidemic in Trans Nzoia County while 20 PLHIV (10male and 10 female) participated in IDIs. Twenty-five individuals living with HIV participated in four FGDs - two groups for men and two for women. Key informants were purposively selected, while every third patient above 18years at the Kitale HIV Clinic was invited to share their HIV care experience through IDIs or FGDs. Trained research assistants moderated all sessions and audio recordings were transcribed and analyzed thematically.Results:Findings showed that PLHIV in Trans Nzoia County used both conventional and complementary alternative care for HIV; however, public health facilities were preferred. Popular perceived benefits of adopting care were relief from symptoms and the chance to live longer. Benefits of care uptake included weight gain, renewed energy, and positive behavior change. Individual-level barriers to HIV care included lack of money and food, use of alternative care, negative side effects of ART, denial, and disclosure difficulties. At the community level, stigma, limited social support for conventional HIV treatment, and poor means of transport were reported. The health system barriers were limited supplies and staff, long distance to conventional HIV care, and unprofessional providers.Conclusions:Diverse individual, community and health system barriers continue to affect HIV care-seeking efforts in Kenya. Appreciation of context and lived experiences allows for development of realistic care models en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher BMC Health services research en_US
dc.subject Human immunodeficiency virus care en_US
dc.subject Focus group discussions en_US
dc.title Qualitative exploration of perceivedbenefits of care and barriers influencingHIV care in trans Nzoia, Kenya en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account