Moi University Open Access Repository

Empiric Tuberculosis Therapy versus Isoniazid in Advanced HIV- infected Adult Outpatients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy: a Multi-Country Randomized Controlled Trial

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lagat, David
dc.contributor.author Mugyenyi, Peter
dc.contributor.author Nyirenda, Mulinda
dc.contributor.author Gupta, Amita
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-30T06:44:41Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-30T06:44:41Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/3205
dc.description.abstract Background—Mortality within the first 6 months after initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) is common in resource-limited settings and is often due to tuberculosis (TB) among patients with advanced HIV disease. Isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) is recommended in HIV-infected adults, but sub-clinical TB can be difficult to diagnose. We hypothesized that empiric TB treatment would reduce early mortality compared to IPT in high-burden settings. Methods—We conducted a multi-country randomized clinical trial comparing empiric TB therapy (Empiric) vs. isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) in HIV-infected outpatients initiating ART with CD4 counts <50 cells/mm 3 . Individuals were screened for TB using a symptom screen, locally available diagnostics, and the GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay when available. The primary endpoint was survival (death or unknown status) at 24 weeks post randomization. Kaplan Meier estimates of the endpoint rates across arms were compared by the z-test. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01380080). Findings—From October 31, 2011 until June 9, 2014, we randomized 850 participants (424 in Empiric arm and 426 in IPT arm); the median CD4 count at baseline was 18 cells/mm 3 (IQR: 9, 32). At week 24, each arm had 22 primary endpoints, for rates of 5.2% in each arm (95% CI: 3.5% to 7.8% for Empiric and 3.4% to 7.8% for IPT; absolute risk difference of -0.06% (95% CI: −3.05% to 2.94%). Grade 3 or 4 signs or symptoms occurred in 50 (12%) in the Empiric arm and 46 (11%) in the IPT arm. Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities occurred in 99 (23%) in the Empiric arm and 97 (23%) in the IPT arm. Incident TB was more common in the Empiric arm (31 vs. 18 events, p=0.01).Interpretation—Empiric TB therapy did not reduce mortality at 24 weeks in outpatient adults initiating ART with advanced HIV disease. The low mortality rate of the trial supports implementation of systematic TB screening and IPT in outpatients with advanced HIV disease. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Lancet en_US
dc.subject HIV en_US
dc.subject Tuberculosis en_US
dc.subject Antiretroviral en_US
dc.title Empiric Tuberculosis Therapy versus Isoniazid in Advanced HIV- infected Adult Outpatients Initiating Antiretroviral Therapy: a Multi-Country Randomized Controlled Trial en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account