DSpace Repository

Prevalence of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Antiretroviral Drugs in a Large Kenyan Cohort

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kimaiyo Sylvester
dc.contributor.author Kigen Gabriel
dc.contributor.author Sang Edwin
dc.contributor.author Owen Andrew
dc.contributor.author Jakait Beatrice
dc.contributor.author Faragher Brian
dc.contributor.author Back David
dc.contributor.author Sara Gibbons
dc.contributor.author Kay Seden
dc.contributor.author Khoo Saye H
dc.date.accessioned 2019-02-06T07:53:58Z
dc.date.available 2019-02-06T07:53:58Z
dc.date.issued 2012-02-23
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016800
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/2662
dc.description.abstract ackground: Clinically significant drug-drug interactions (CSDIs) involving antiretrovirals are frequent and under-recognized in developed countries, but data are lacking for developing countries. Methodology and Principal Findings: To investigate the prevalence of CSDIs between antiretrovirals and coadministered drugs, we surveyed prescriptions dispensed in a large HIV clinic in Kenya. Of 1040 consecutive patients screened, 996 were eligible for inclusion. CSDIs were defined as ‘major’ (capable of causing severe or permanent damage, contraindicated, avoid or not recommended by the manufacturer, or requiring dose modification) or ‘moderate’ (manufacturers advise caution, or close monitoring, or capable of causing clinical deterioration). A total of 334 patients (33.5%) were at risk for a CSDI, potentially lowering antiretroviral drug concentrations in 120 (12%) patients. Major interactions most frequently involved rifampicin (12.4%, mostly with efavirenz) and azoles (2.7%) whereas moderate interactions were frequently azoles (13%), steroids (11%), and antimalarials (3%). Multivariable analyses suggested that patients at risk for CSDIs had lower CD4 counts (P = 0.006) and baseline weight (P = 0.023) and WHO Stage 3 or 4 disease (P # 0.007). Risk for CSDIs was not associated with particular regimens, although only 116 (11.6%) patients were receiving WHO second line regimens. Conclusions: One in three patients receiving antiretrovirals in our programme were at risk of CSDIs. Strategies need to be urgently developed to avoid important drug interactions, to identify early markers of toxicity and to manage unavoidable interactions safely in order to reduce risk of harm, and to maximize the effectiveness of mass antiretroviral deployment in Africa en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journals.plos.org en_US
dc.subject Antiretroviral Drugs en_US
dc.title Prevalence of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Antiretroviral Drugs in a Large Kenyan Cohort en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account