Models of care for orphaned and separated children and upholding children’s rights: cross-sectional evidence from western Kenya

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa is home to approximately 55 million orphaned children. The growing orphan crisis has overwhelmed many communities and has weakened the ability of extended families to meet traditional care-taking expectations. Other models of care and support have emerged in sub-Saharan Africa to address the growing orphan crisis, yet there is a lack of information on these models available in the literature. We applied a human rights framework using the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child to understand what extent children ’basic human rights were being upheld in institutional vs. community- or family-based care settingsin Uasin Gishu County, Kenya. Methods: The Orphaned and Separated Children’s Assessments Related to their Health and Well-Being Project is a 5-year cohort of orphaned children and adolescents aged ≤18 year. This descriptive analysis was restricted tobaseline data. Chi-Square test was used to test for associations between categorical /dichotomous variables. Fisher’s exact test was also used if some cells had expected value of less than 5. Results:Included in this analysis are data from 300 households, 19 Charitable Children’s Institutions (CCIs) and 7community-based organizations. In total, 2871 children were enrolled and had baseline assessments done: 1390 in CCI’s and 1481 living in households in the community. We identified and described four broad models of care for orphaned and separated children, including: institutional care (sub-classified as‘Pure CCI’for those only providingresidential care,‘CCI-Plus’for those providing both residential care and community-based supports to orphanedchildren , and‘CCI-Shelter’which are rescue, detention, or other short-term residential support), family-based care,community-based care and self-care. Children in institutional care (95%) were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likelyto have their basic material needs met in comparison to those in family-based care (17%) and institutions were better able to provide an adequate standard of living. Conclusions: Each model of care we identified has strengths and weaknesses. The orphan crisis in sub-Saharan Africa requires a diversity of care environments in order to meet the needs of children and uphold their rights. Family-based care plays an essential role; however, households require increased support to adequately care for children.