Abstract:
Background: Respiratory distress syndrome remains an important cause of
22 neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Early initiation of continuous
23 positive airway pressure is a standard of care for preterm infants with
24 respiratory distress syndrome. Positive end-expiratory pressure reduces the
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ARTICLE IN PRESS
ARTICLE IN PRESS2
25 need for invasive ventilation and prevents chronic lung disease. However,
26 the optimum positive end expiratory pressure level to effectively treat
27 respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants remains unknown.
28 Objective: To determine the optimal initial positive end expiratory pressure
29 level in management of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome.
30 Methods: This prospective descriptive study was conducted from July 2023
31 to January 2024 in the newborn unit of Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital.
32 A total of 204 preterm infants (28-34 weeks gestational age) with
33 respiratory distress syndrome who required Continuous Positive Airway
34 Pressure treatment were recruited. Data on the maternal and neonatal
35 characteristics, low and high positive end expiratory pressure levels, and
36 outcomes at 72 hours were collected and analysed. Descriptive statistics
37 were used for continuous variables, and frequencies were used for
38 categorical data. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically
39 significant at the 95% confidence interval. Receiver operating characteristic
40 curves were used to determine the optimal positive end expiratory pressure
41 level.
42 Results: A total of 45 and 159 preterm infants were started on low and high
43 positive end expiratory pressure levels, respectively. Among 159 (77.9%) of
44 the preterm infants started on high positive end expiratory pressure levels,
45 majority (135, 66.2%) were initiated at a positive end expiratory pressure
46 level of 6 cmH2O. The Area under the curve for low positive end expiratory
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
ARTICLE IN PRESS
ARTICLE IN PRESS3
47 pressure levels was 0.5757 and the one for high positive end expiratory
48 pressure levels was 0.5405. DeLong's test for two ROC curves D = 0.82979,
49 df = 120.8, p value = 0.4083. The area under the curve of both low and high
50 positive end expiratory pressure levels were close and not significantly
51 different (p=0.4083).
52 Conclusion: In this study, low positive end expiratory pressure was
53 associated with low failure rate and complications. However low and high
54 positive end expiratory pressure levels were not significantly different to
55 determine the optimal initial PEEP. Further research are needed to
56 determine optimal PEEP for continuous positive airway pressure initiation
57 in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome