Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9649
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllott, Helen-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Alan-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorNyaoke, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Ogoti-
dc.contributor.authorOduor, Michael Oriwo-
dc.contributor.authorKarangau, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorSawe, Sheila-
dc.contributor.authorEphraim, Ochola-
dc.contributor.authorAmeh, Charles Anawo-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-25T09:33:56Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-25T09:33:56Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-17-
dc.identifier.uri//doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06660-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9649-
dc.description.abstractBackground Significant differences in outcomes for mothers and babies following obstetric surgical interventions between low- and middle-income countries and high-income settings have demonstrated a need for improvements in quality of care and training of obstetric surgical and anaesthetic providers. To address this, a five-day face-to-face training intervention was developed. When roll-out was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was rede- signed for delivery by blended learning. Methods This 3-part blended-learning course (part-1: 15 h self-directed online learning, part-2: 13 h facilitated contemporaneous virtual workshops and part-3: 10 h face-to-face delivery), was conducted in Kenya. We assessed the completion rate of part-1 (21 assignments), participation rate in parts 2 and 3, participant satisfaction and change in knowledge and skills. Additionally, we compared the cost of the blended delivery to the 5-day face-to-face delivery, in GB pounds. Results Sixty-five doctors participated in part 1, with 53 completing at least 90% of the assignments. Sixty doctors participated in part 2, and 53 participated in part 3. All participants who completed an evaluation reported (n = 53) that the training was relevant, useful and would lead to changes in their clinical practice. Mean (SD) knowledge score improved from 64% (7%) to 80% (8%) and practical skills from 44% (14%) to 87% (7%). The blended course achieved a cost-saving of £204 per participant compared to the 5-day face-to-face delivery approach. Conclusion We have demonstrated that a blended learning approach to clinical training in a low-resource setting is feasible, acceptable and cost effective. More studies are required to investigate the effectiveness of this approach on health outcomes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship202549en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectCaesareanen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectQuality of careen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectBlended learningen_US
dc.titleImproving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: evaluation of a blended learning approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.