Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9265
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShikuku, Duncan N.-
dc.contributor.authorHauwa, Mohammed-
dc.contributor.authorMwanzia, Lydia-
dc.contributor.authorLadur, Alice Norah-
dc.contributor.authorNandikove, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorUyara, Alphonce-
dc.contributor.authorWaigwe, Catherine-
dc.contributor.authorNyaga, Lucy-
dc.contributor.authorIssak, Bashir-
dc.contributor.authorNdirangu, Eunice-
dc.contributor.authorBedwell, Carol-
dc.contributor.authorBar-Zeev, Sarah-
dc.contributor.authorAmeh, Charles-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-12T08:43:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-12T08:43:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9265-
dc.description.abstractBackground Midwifery education is under-invested in developing countries with limited opportunities for midwifery educators to improve/maintain their core professional competencies. To improve the quality of midwifery education and capacity for educators to update their competencies, a blended midwifery educator-specific continuous professional development (CPD) programme was designed with key stakeholders. This study evaluated the feasibility of this programme in Kenya and Nigeria. Methods This was a mixed methods intervention study using a concurrent nested design. 120 randomly selected midwifery educators from 81 pre-service training institutions were recruited. Educators completed four self-directed online learning (SDL) modules and three-day practical training of the blended CPD programme on teaching methods (theory and clinical skills), assessments, effective feedback and digital innovations in teaching and learning. Pre- and post-training knowledge using multiple choice questions in SDL; confidence (on a 0–4 Likert scale) and practical skills in preparing a teaching a plan and microteaching (against a checklist) were measured. Differences in knowledge, confidence and skills were analysed. Participants’ reaction to the programme (relevance and satisfaction assessed on a 0–4 Likert scale, what they liked and challenges) were collected. Key informant interviews with nursing and midwifery councils and institutions’ managers were conducted. Thematic framework analysis was conducted for qualitative data. Results 116 (96.7%) and 108 (90%) educators completed the SDL and practical components respectively. Mean knowledge scores in SDL modules improved from 52.4% (±10.4) to 80.4% (±8.1), preparing teaching plan median scores improved from 63.6% (IQR 45.5) to 81.8% (IQR 27.3), and confidence in applying selected pedagogy skills improved from 2.7 to 3.7, p<0.001. Participants rated the SDL and practical components of the programme high for relevance and satisfaction (median, 4 out of 4 for both). After training, 51.4% and 57.9% of the participants scored 75% or higher in preparing teaching plans and microteaching assessments. Country, training institution type or educator characteristics had no significant associations with overall competence in preparing teaching plans and microteaching (p>0.05). Qualitatively, educators found the programme educative, flexible, convenient, motivating, and interactive for learning. Internet connectivity, computer technology, costs and time constraints were potential challenges to completing the programme. Conclusion The programme was feasible and effective in improving the knowledge and skills of educators for effective teaching/learning. For successful roll-out, policy framework for mandatory midwifery educator specific CPD programme is needed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectMidwiferyen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the feasibility of a midwifery educator continuous professional development (CPD) programme in Kenya and Nigeria: a mixed methods studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation_of_the_feasibility_of_a_midwifery_educa (1).pdf2.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.