Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9075
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSirera, Betty-
dc.contributor.authorNaanyu, Violet-
dc.contributor.authorKussin, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorLagat, David-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-09T08:33:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-09T08:33:41Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-22-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9075-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Patient satisfaction remains a key area of interest worldwide; utilizing a patient-centered communication approach, particularly with patients with chronic life-limiting illnesses may be one way to achieve this. However, there is a dearth of empirical information on the effect of patient-centered communication strategies in patients with chronic life-limiting illnesses in Kenya on patient satisfaction. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of patient-centered communication on patient satisfaction. Methods: We conducted our study at a tertiary teaching and referral hospital in Kenya. We utilized a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test study design and engaged 301 adult medical in-patients with chronic life limiting conditions. We randomized them to receive patient-centered communication, and evaluated the change in patient satisfaction scores using an adapted Medical Interview satisfaction Scale 21 (MISS 21). Results: Two hundred and seventy-eight out of 301 recruited participants completed the study. The baseline characteristics of the participants randomized to the control and intervention arms were similar. Although both the control and intervention arms had a decline in the mean difference scores, the intervention arm recorded a larger decline, −15.04 (−20.6, −9.47) compared to −7.87 (−13.63, −2.12), with a statistically significant mean difference between the two groups at −7.16 (−9.67, −4.46). Participants in the intervention arm were less likely to: understand the cause of their illness (p < 0.001), understand aspects of their illness (p < 0.001), understand the management plan (p < 0.001), receive all the relevant information on their health (p < 0.001), and to receive adequate self-care information (p < 0.001). They were also less likely to acknowledge a good interpersonal relationship with the healthcare providers (p < 0.001), to feel comfortable discussing private issues (p < 0.004), and to feel that the consultation time was adequate (p < 0.001). Conclusion and recommendation: Contrary to expectation, patient-centered communication did not result in improved patient satisfaction scores. Further studies can evaluate factors affecting and explaining this relationship and assess intermediate and long-term effects of provision of a patient-centered communication in diverse global contexts.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherfrontiersen_US
dc.subjectChronic life-limiting illnessesen_US
dc.subjectpPatient-centered communication approachhen_US
dc.titleImpact of patient-centered communication on patient satisfaction scores in patients with chronic life-limiting illnesses: an experience from Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fmed-11-1290907.pdf639.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.