Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9057
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavidovi c, Masa-
dc.contributor.authorLem, Serra Asangbeh-
dc.contributor.authorTaghavi, Katayoun-
dc.contributor.authorDhokotera, Tafadzwa-
dc.contributor.authorJaquet, Antoine-
dc.contributor.authorMusick, Beverly-
dc.contributor.authorSchalkwyk, Cari Van-
dc.contributor.authorSchwappach, David-
dc.contributor.authorRohner, Eliane-
dc.contributor.authorGad Murenzi, Gad-
dc.contributor.authorWools-Kaloustian, Kara-
dc.contributor.authorAnastos, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorOmenge, Orang’o Elkanah-
dc.contributor.authorPierre Boni, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorDuda, Stephany N.-
dc.contributor.authorGroote, Per von-
dc.contributor.authorBohlius, Julia-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-07T07:44:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-07T07:44:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-19-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/9057-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Of women with cervical cancer (CC) and HIV, 85% live in sub-Saharan Africa, where 21% of all CC cases are attributable to HIV infection. We aimed to generate internationally acceptable facility-based indicators to monitor and guide scale up of CC prevention and care services offered on-site or off-site by HIV clinics. Methods: We reviewed the literature and extracted relevant indicators, grouping them into domains along the CC control continuum. From February 2021 to March 2022, we conducted a three-round, online Delphi process to reach consensus on indicators. We invited 106 experts to participate. Through an anonymous,(round 1), then rated them for 5 criteria on a 5-point Likert-type scale (rounds 2 and 3) and then ranked their importance (round 3). Results: We reviewed 39 policies from 21 African countries and 7 from international organizations; 72 experts from 15 sub-Saharan Africa countries or international organizations participated in our Delphi process. Response rates were 34% in round 1, 40% in round 2, and 44% in round 3. Experts reached consensus for 17 indicators in the following domains: primary prevention (human papillomavirus prevention, n = 2), secondary prevention (screening, triage, treatment of precancerous lesions, n = 11), tertiary prevention (CC diagnosis and care, n = 2), and long-term impact of the program and linkage to HIV service (n = 2). Conclusion: We recommend that HIV clinics that offer CC control services in sub-Saharan Africa implement the 17 indicators stepwise and adapt them to context to improve monitoring along the CC control cascade. iterative process, participants adapted the indicators to their contexten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Health, Inc.en_US
dc.subjectWomen living with HIV,en_US
dc.subjectAcquired immunodeficiency syndrome,en_US
dc.subjectEarly detection of canceren_US
dc.subjectCervical canceren_US
dc.subjectConsensusen_US
dc.titleFacility-Based indicators to manage and scale Up cervical cancer prevention and care services for women living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: a three-round online delphi consensus methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OMENGE ORANGO.pdf1.02 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.