Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKirui, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorKomen, Joyce-
dc.contributor.authorMwarumba, Mwavita-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T06:49:48Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T06:49:48Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8697-
dc.description.abstractDebt has always been perceived as expensive compared to equity, many people, especially businessmen have always assumed that debt is more expensive to equity, however going through literature and theories it is clear that this has been the most mistaken identity, according to pecking order theory, firms would first of all prefer internals funds, followed by debt and lastly followed by equity, thus according to the Myer’s Pecking order theory, equity is less preferred than debt and internal funds are preferred more to debt. Thus as per the order of priority, Debt is preferred to equity, and equity according to the theory is more expensive in the long run to debt, the reasons being the tax advantage given to debt holders among others . Keywords: Pecking order theory, debt, equity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIISTEen_US
dc.subjectDebten_US
dc.subjectEquityen_US
dc.titleThe mistaken identity: debt versus equity: the kenyan perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Business and Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JOYCE etal...pdf121.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.