Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8411
Title: "It's complicated…": Exploring second stage caesarean sections and reasons for non-performance of assisted vaginal births in Kenya: A mixed methods study
Authors: Dickinson, Fiona M.
Allott, Helen
Nyongesa, Paul
Eyinda, Martin
Muchemi, Onesmus M.
Karangau, Stephen W.
Ogoti, Evans
Nassir, A. Shaban
Godia, Pamela
Nyaga, Lucy
. Ameh, Charles A
Keywords: Caesarean Section (CS)
Assisted vaginal births
Issue Date: Nov-2023
Publisher: Dickinson et al.
Abstract: Unnecessary Caesarean Section (CS) can have adverse effects on women and their new- borns. Assisted vaginal birth/delivery (AVB/AVD) using a suction device or obstetric forceps is a potential alternative when delays or complications occur in the second stage of labour. Unlike CS, AVB using a suction device does not require regional or general anaesthesia, can often be performed by midwives, and does not scar the uterus, lowering the risk of maternal mortality and morbidity, in this and subsequent pregnancies. This study examined the appropriateness and outcomes of second stage CS (SSCS), and reasons for low levels of AVB use, in Kenya. Using a mixed methods study design, we reviewed case notes from women having SSCS births and AVB, and conducted key informant interviews with health- care providers, from 8 purposively selected hospitals in Kenya. Randomly selected SSCS and all AVB case notes were reviewed by a panel of four experienced obstetricians, and appropriateness of the procedure assessed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with obstetricians, medical officers and midwives, and analysed using a thematic approach. Review of 67 SSCS case notes showed 10% might have been conducted as AVBs, with a further 58% unable to be classified due to inadequate/inconsistent record keeping or exces- sive delay following initial CS decision. Outcomes following SSCS showed perinatal mortal- ity rate of 89.6/1,000 births, with 11% of infants and 9% of mothers experiencing complications. Non-referred cases of AVB showed good outcomes. The findings of the 20 interviews explored the experience and confidence of healthcare providers in performing AVBs, and adequacy of the training they received. Key reasons for non-performance included lack of functioning equipment, lack of trained staff or their rotation to other depart- ments. Reasons for non-performance of AVB were complex and often multiple. Any solu- tions to these problems will need to address various local, regional and national issues
URI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001495
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8411
Appears in Collections:School of Public Health

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.