Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8121
Title: Barriers to implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in three low- and middle-income country tertiary care settings: findings from a multi-site qualitative study
Authors: Rolfe Jr, Robert
Kwobah, Charles
Muro, Florida
Ruwanpathirana, Anushka
Lyamuya, Furaha
Bodinayake, Champica
Nagahawatte, Ajith
Piyasiri, Bhagya
Sheng, Tianchen
Bollinger, John
Zhang, Chi
Ostbye, Truls
Ali, Shamim
Drew, Richard
Kussin, Peter
J. Anderson, Deverick
W. Woods, Christopher
H. Watt, Melissa
T. Mmbaga, Blandina
Tillekeratne, L. Gayani
Keywords: Antimicrobial Stewardship
Low- and middle-income countries
Qualitative analysis
Issue Date: 19-Mar-2021
Publisher: BMC
Abstract: Background: Antimicrobial resistance has been named as one of the top ten threats to public health in the world. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can help reduce antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine perceived barriers to the development and implementation of ASPs in tertiary care cent- ers in three low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Interviews were conducted with 45 physicians at tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka (n = 22), Kenya (12), and Tanzania (11). Interviews assessed knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and ASPs, current antimicrobial prescrib- ing practices, access to diagnostics that inform antimicrobial use, receptiveness to ASPs, and perceived barriers to implementing ASPs. Two independent reviewers coded the interviews using principles of applied thematic analysis, and comparisons of themes were made across the three sites. Results: Barriers to improving antimicrobial prescribing included prohibitively expensive antimicrobials, limited antimicrobial availability, resistance to changing current practices regarding antimicrobial prescribing, and limited diagnostic capabilities. The most frequent of these barriers in all three locations was limited drug availability. Many physicians in all three sites had not heard of ASPs before the interviews. Improved education was a suggested compo- nent of ASPs at all three sites. The creation of guidelines was also recommended, without prompting, by interviewees at all three sites. Although most participants felt microbiological results were helpful in tailoring antibiotic courses, some expressed distrust of laboratory culture results. Biomarkers like erythrocyte sedimentation rate and c-reactive protein were not felt to be specific enough to guide antimicrobial therapy. Despite limited or no prior knowledge of ASPs, most interviewees were receptive to implementing protocols that would include documentation and consulta- tion with ASPs regarding antimicrobial prescribing Conclusions: Our study highlighted several important barriers to implementing ASPs that were shared between three tertiary care centers in LMICs. Improving drug availability, enhancing availability of and trust in microbiologic data, creating local guidelines, and providing education to physicians regarding antimicrobial prescribing are impor- tant steps that could be taken by ASPs in these facilities.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-021-00929-4
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8121
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
KWOBAH.pdf1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.