Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7739
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOyando, Robinson-
dc.contributor.authorWere, Vincent-
dc.contributor.authorKoros, Hillary-
dc.contributor.authorMugo, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorKamano, Jemima-
dc.contributor.authorEtyang, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Adrianna-
dc.contributor.authorHanson, Kara-
dc.contributor.authorPerel, Pablo-
dc.contributor.authorBarasa, Edwine-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T11:58:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T11:58:56Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01923-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7739-
dc.description.abstractBackground Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) can impose a substantial financial burden to households in the absence of an effective financial risk protection mechanism. The national health insurance fund (NHIF) has included NCD services in its national scheme. We evaluated the effectiveness of NHIF in providing financial risk protection to households with persons living with hypertension and/or diabetes in Kenya. Methods We carried out a prospective cohort study, following 888 households with at least one individual living with hypertension and/or diabetes for 12 months. The exposure arm comprised households that are enrolled in the NHIF national scheme, while the control arm comprised households that were not enrolled in the NHIF. Study participants were drawn from two counties in Kenya. We used the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) as the outcome of interest. We used coarsened exact matching and a conditional logistic regression model to analyse the odds of CHE among households enrolled in the NHIF compared with unenrolled households. Socioeconomic inequality in CHE was examined using concentration curves and indices. Results We found strong evidence that NHIF-enrolled households spent a lower share (12.4%) of their household budget on healthcare compared with unenrolled households (23.2%) (p = 0.004). While households that were enrolled in NHIF were less likely to incur CHE, we did not find strong evidence that they are better protected from CHE compared with households without NHIF (OR = 0.67; p = 0.47). The concentration index (CI) for CHE showed a pro- poor distribution (CI: -0.190, p < 0.001). Almost half (46.9%) of households reported active NHIF enrolment at baseline but this reduced to 10.9% after one year, indicating an NHIF attrition rate of 76.7%. The depth of NHIF cover (i.e., the share of out-of-pocket healthcare costs paid by NHIF) among households with active NHIF was 29.6%. Conclusion We did not find strong evidence that the NHIF national scheme is effective in providing financial risk protection to households with individuals living with hypertension and/diabetes in Kenya. This could partly be explained by the low depth of cover of the NHIF national scheme, and the high attrition rate. To enhance NHIFen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMR/T023538/1en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMCen_US
dc.subjectNon-communicable diseasesen_US
dc.subjectHealth expenditureen_US
dc.subjectFinancial risk protection,en_US
dc.subjectHealth insuranceen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the effectiveness of the National Health Insurance Fund in providing financial protection to households with hypertension and diabetes patients in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.