Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNjuguna, F.-
dc.contributor.authorMostert, S.-
dc.contributor.authorSeijffert, A.-
dc.contributor.authorMusimbi, J-
dc.contributor.authorLangat, S.-
dc.contributor.authorBurgt, R. H. M. van der-
dc.contributor.authorSkiles, J.-
dc.contributor.authorSitaresmi, M. N.-
dc.contributor.authorVen, P. M. van de-
dc.contributor.authorKaspers, G. J. L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-04T08:57:50Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-04T08:57:50Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7729-
dc.description.abstractPurpose Our study explores socioeconomic, treatment-relat- ed, and psychological experiences of parents during cancer treatment of their children at an academic hospital in Kenya. Methods This cross-sectional study used semi-structured questionnaires. Parents whose children came for cancer treat- ment consecutively between November 2012 and April 2013 were interviewed. Results Between 2012 and 2013, 115 oncology patients attended the hospital and 75 families (response rate 65 %) were interviewed. Cancer treatment resulted in financial dif- ficulties (89 %). More information about cancer and treatment was required (88 %). More contact with doctors was needed (83 %). At diagnosis, cancer was perceived as curable (63 %). However, parents were told by health-care providers that most children with cancer die (49 %). Parents had difficulties with understanding doctors’ vocabulary (48 %). Common reasons to miss hospital appointments were travel costs (52 %) and hospital costs (28 %). Parents (95 %) used complementary alternative treatment (CAM) for their children. Health-care providers told parents not to use CAM (49 %). Parents had not discussed their CAM use with doctors (71 %). Community members isolated families because their child had cancer (25 %), believed that child was bewitched (57 %), advised to use CAM (61 %), and stopped conventional treatment (45 %). Some families (15 %) never disclosed the child’s illness to community members. Parents shared experiences with other parents at the ward (97 %) and would otherwise not understand the disease and its treatment (87 %). Conclusions Parents suffer financial hardships and are dissatis- fied with doctors’ communication regarding their children’s con- dition. CAM is very commonly used. Doctors need to improve their communication skills and discuss CAM more openly. Can- cer programs should include more support for parents: financial assistance, a facility where parents and children can stay during the course of therapy, and parent support groups.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectChildhood canceren_US
dc.subjectTreatment-related experiencesen_US
dc.subjectSocioeconomic experiencesen_US
dc.subjectPsychological experiencesen_US
dc.subjectPhysician communication .en_US
dc.subjectComplementary alternative treatmenten_US
dc.titleParental experiences of childhood cancer treatment in Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NJUGUNA F.pdf297.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.