Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7639
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRouleau, Katherine-
dc.contributor.authorChege, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorCouturier, Francois-
dc.contributor.authorGodoy-Rui, Paula-
dc.contributor.authorBourget, Monique-
dc.contributor.authorGrand’Maison, Paul H.-
dc.contributor.authorMelanie, Henry-
dc.contributor.authorKerling, Israel-
dc.contributor.authorKapoor, Videsh-
dc.contributor.authorKurniawan, Hendra-
dc.contributor.authorLobo, Louella-
dc.contributor.authorMaiga, Mahamane-
dc.contributor.authorFranca, Samantha Pereira-
dc.contributor.authorRedwood-Campbell, Lynda-
dc.contributor.authorRodas, Jamie-
dc.contributor.authorSohal, Raman-
dc.contributor.authorWondimagegn, Dawit-
dc.contributor.authorWoollard, Robert-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-26T07:36:42Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-26T07:36:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-03-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7639-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a limited evidentiary base on the development of family medicine in different contexts and countries. The lack of evidence impedes our ability to compare and characterize family medicine models and identify areas of success that have led to the effective provision of care. This paper offers a comparative compilation and analysis of the develop- ment of family medicine training programs in seven countries: Brazil, Canada, Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia, Kenya, and Mali. METHODS: Using qualitative case studies, this paper examines the process of developing family medicine programs, including enabling strategies and barri- ers, and shared lessons. An appreciative inquiry framework and complex adap- tive systems thinking inform our qualitative study. RESULTS: Committed partnerships, the contribution of champions, health pol- icy, and adaptability were identified as key enablers in all seven case studies. The case studies further reveal that some enablers were more salient in certain contexts as compared to others, and that it is the interaction of enablers that is crucial for understanding how and why initiatives succeeded. The barriers that emerged across the seven case studies include: (1) resistance from other medi- cal specialties, (2) lack of resources and capabilities, (3) difficulty in sustaining support of champions, and (4) challenges in brokering effective partnerships. CONCLUSIONS: A key insight from this study is that the implementation of family medicine is nonlinear, dynamic, and complex. The findings of this com- parative analysis offer insights and strategies that can inform the design and development of family medicine programs elsewhereen_US
dc.description.sponsorship07467-00020799- 028).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSocirty of teachers of family medicineen_US
dc.subjectFamily medicineen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Careen_US
dc.titleStrengthening primary care through family medicine around the World: Collaborating toward promising practicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CHEGE.pdf211.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.