Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7035
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPremji, Zul-
dc.contributor.authorUmeh, Rich E-
dc.contributor.authorOwusu-Agyei, Seth-
dc.contributor.authorEsamai, Fabian-
dc.contributor.authorEzedinachi, Emmanuel U-
dc.contributor.authorOguche, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorBorrmann, Steffen-
dc.contributor.authorSowunmi, Akintunde-
dc.contributor.authorDuparc, Stephan-
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Paula L-
dc.contributor.authorPamba, Allan-
dc.contributor.authorKellam, Lynda-
dc.contributor.authorGuiguemde, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorWard, Stephen A-
dc.contributor.authorWinstanley, Peter A-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T12:16:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T12:16:02Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-19-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7035-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (CDA) was developed as an affordable, simple, fixed-dose artemisinin- based combination therapy for use in Africa. This trial was a randomized parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare CDA and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) efficacy in uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria and further define the CDA safety profile, particularly its hematological safety in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) -deficient patients.Methods and Findings: The trial was conducted at medical centers at 11 sites in five African countries between June 2006 and August 2007. 1372 patients ($1 to ,15 years old, median age 3 years) with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomized (2:1) to receive CDA 2/2.5/4 mg/kg once daily for three days (N = 914) or six-doses of AL over three days (N = 458). Non-inferiority of CDA versus AL for efficacy was evaluated in the Day 28 per-protocol (PP) population using parasitological cure (polymerase chain reaction [PCR]-corrected). Cure rates were 94.1% (703/747) for CDA and 97.4% (369/ 379) for AL (treatment difference –3.3%, 95%CI –5.6, 20.9). CDA was non-inferior to AL, but there was simultaneous superiority of AL (upper 95%CI limit ,0). Adequate clinical and parasitological response at Day 28 (uncorrected for reinfection) was 79% (604/765) with CDA and 83% (315/381) with AL. In patients with a G6PD-deficient genotype (94/603 [16%] hemizygous males, 22/598 [4%] homozygous females), CDA had the propensity to cause severe and clinically concerning hemoglobin decreases: the mean hemoglobin nadir was 75 g/L (95%CI 71, 79) at Day 7 versus 97 g/L (95%CI 91, 102) for AL. There were three deaths, unrelated to study medication (two with CDA, one with AL).Conclusions: Although parasitologically effective at Day 28, the hemolytic potential of CDA in G6PD-deficient patients makes it unsuitable for use in a public health setting in Africa.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS ONEen_US
dc.subjectChlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunateen_US
dc.subjectA randomized, double-blinden_US
dc.subjectFixed-dose artemisinin- based combination therapyen_US
dc.titleChlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate versus artemether-lumefantrine: A randomized, double-blindphase III trial in african children and adolescents with uncomplicated plasmodium falciparum malariaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FABIAN 4.pdf405.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.