Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6838
Title: Looking beyond the numbers: quality assurance procedures in the Global network for women’s and children’s health research maternal newborn health registry
Authors: Garces, Ana
MacGuire, Emily
Franklin, Holly L.
Alfaro, Norma
Arroyo, Gustavo
Figueroa, Lester
Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
Saleem, Sarah
Esamai, Fabian
Patel, Archana
Chomba, Elwyn
Tshefu, Antoinette
Haque, Rashidul
Patterson, Jacquelyn K.
Liechty, Edward A.
Derman, Richard J.
Carlo, Waldemar A.
Petri, William
Koso‑ThomasMcClure, Marion Elizabeth M.
Goldenberg, Robert L.
Hibberd, Patricia
Krebs, Nancy F.
Keywords: Quality assurance
Training for research studies
Adult learning
Quality control
Public health training
Global network
Issue Date: 30-Nov-2020
Publisher: BMC
Abstract: Background: Quality assurance (QA) is a process that should be an integral part of research to protect the rights and safety of study participants and to reduce the likelihood that the results are affected by bias in data collection. Most QA plans include processes related to study preparation and regulatory compliance, data collection, data analysis and publication of study results. However, little detailed information is available on the specific procedures associated with QA processes to ensure high‑quality data in multi‑site studies. Methods: The Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Maternal Newborn Health Registy (MNHR) is a prospective population‑based registry of pregnancies and deliveries that is carried out in 8 international sites. Since its inception, QA procedures have been utilized to ensure the quality of the data. More recently, a training and certifica‑ tion process was developed to ensure that standardized, scientifically accurate clinical definitions are used consist‑ ently across sites. Staff complete a web‑based training module that reviews the MNHR study protocol, study forms and clinical definitions developed by MNHR investigators and are certified through a multiple choice examination prior to initiating study activities and every six months thereafter. A standardized procedure for supervision and evalu‑ ation of field staff is carried out to ensure that research activites are conducted according to the protocol across all the MNHR sites. Conclusions: We developed standardized QA processes for training, certification and supervision of the MNHR, a multisite research registry. It is expected that these activities, together with ongoing QA processes, will help to further optimize data quality for this protocol.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-01009-3
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6838
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.