Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6832
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSnelgrove, John W.-
dc.contributor.authorAlera, Joy Marsha-
dc.contributor.authorFoster, Michael C.-
dc.contributor.authorBett, Kipchumba C. N.-
dc.contributor.authorBloomfield, Gerald S.-
dc.contributor.authorSilversides, Candice K.-
dc.contributor.authorBarasa, Felix A.-
dc.contributor.authorChristoffersen-Deb, Astrid-
dc.contributor.authorMillar, Heather C.-
dc.contributor.authorThorne, Julie G.-
dc.contributor.authorSpitzer, Rachel F.-
dc.contributor.authorVedanthan, Rajesh-
dc.contributor.authorOkun, Nanette-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-29T07:30:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-29T07:30:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-09-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5334/gh.826-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6832-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) in sub-Saharan Africa contributes to significant cardiac morbidity and mortality, yet prevalence estimates of RHD lesions in pregnancy are lacking. Objectives: Our first aim was to evaluate women using echocardiography to estimate the prev- alence of RHD and other cardiac lesions in low-risk pregnancies. Our second aim was to assess the feasibility of screening echocardiography and its acceptability to patients. Methods: We prospectively recruited 601 pregnant women from a low-risk antenatal clinic at a tertiary care maternity centre in Western Kenya. Women completed a questionnaire about past medical history and cardiac symptoms. They underwent standardized screening echocardiography to evaluate RHD and non-RHD associated cardiac lesions. Our primary out- come was RHD-associated cardiac lesions and our secondary outcome was a composite of any clinically-relevant cardiac lesion or echocardiography finding. We also recorded duration of screening echocardiography and its acceptability among pregnant women in this sample. Results: The point prevalence of RHD-associated cardiac lesions was 5.0/1,000 (95% confidence interval: 1.0–14.5), and the point prevalence of all clinically significant lesions/findings was 21.6/1,000 (11.6–36.7). Mean screening time was seven minutes (SD 1.7, range: 4–17) for women without cardiac abnormalities and 13 minutes (SD 4.6, range: 6–23) for women with abnormal findings. Echocardiography was acceptable to women with 74.2% agreeing to participate. Conclusions: The prevalence of clinically-relevant cardiac lesions was moderately high in a low- risk population of pregnant women in Western Kenya.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPMCen_US
dc.subjectRheumatic heart diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectEchocardiographyen_US
dc.subjectEpidemiologyen_US
dc.titlePrevalence of rheumatic heart disease and other cardiac conditions in low-risk pregnancies in Kenya: A prospective echocardiography screening studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.