Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6788
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nyawa, Joshua Malidzo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T06:53:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T06:53:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6788 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The post-war constitutions eschew the reliance of public opinion in adjudication, it alternatively encourages courts to follow a principled, law-based adjudication. It is on this basis that this paper suffices. This paper seeks to show that the 2010 constitution has successfully moved us from the dark ages of societal morality to an era of constitutional morality. However, this paper notes and regrettably so, that our courts have sought to return us back to those days. This paper will critique the Supreme Court’s majority decision in Mohammed and the high court’s decision in Eric Gitari 2. Similarly, this paper will celebrate the Minority decision in Mohammed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | SSRN | en_US |
dc.subject | Constitutional morality | en_US |
dc.subject | Societal morality | en_US |
dc.subject | Legal formalism | en_US |
dc.subject | Minorities | en_US |
dc.title | Constitutional morality vis-à-vis societal morality and populism: An interrogation of the Eric Gitari 2 and Ahmad Abolfathi Mohammed Decisions | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | School of Law |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSRN-id3442472.pdf | 564.78 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.