Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6758
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Nyawa, Joshua Malidzo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-27T07:11:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-09-27T07:11:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6758 | - |
dc.description.abstract | If the promises of the 2010 constitution are to mean anything to the ‘Hohe hahe’, the Dalits or the wanjiku then the court(s) or judges must be responsive. Put it differently, if the desires and aspirations that Kenyans had when promulgating the 2010 constitution are to be more than expressions on a piece of paper, then judges have to embrace the concept of responsiveness. Siri Gloppen3, conceives the term ‘court responsiveness’ to mean the willingness of the courts to respond to the concerns of the marginalized groups. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Justice Mumbi Ngugi and the ‘Have Nots’: Living in the Legacy of P.A.O V AG | en_US |
dc.subject | Legacy | en_US |
dc.title | Justice Mumbi Ngugi and the ‘Have Nots’: Living in the Legacy of P.A.O V AG | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | School of Law |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Justicemumbiandthehavenotsfinale (1).pdf | 459.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.