Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6752
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNyawa, Joshua Malidzo-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T06:48:11Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-27T06:48:11Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6752-
dc.description.abstractMichael Paulsen in his ‘the Constitution of necessity’1 argued that we ought to interpret/ construe the constitution in a manner that would avoid a "constitutional implosion." By this, he meant that the law of self-preservation (the duty of the president/executive to prioritize the preservation of the nation at the expense of a constitutional provision) must always take precedence even if it meant suspending the constitution. Further, that every constitution must contain a self-preservation exemption i.e. a rule of necessity which will allow a violation of the rights. To him, a constitution that lacks such a provision, he calls it a ‘suicide pact’. Saikrishna Prakash in his ‘The Constitution as Suicide Pact’ summarizes Paulsen’s argument by asking a questionen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCovid-19en_US
dc.subjectHuman righten_US
dc.titleHuman Rights and Covid-19 (Corona Virus) in Kenya: Is the Law Silent?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Law

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HUMANRIGHTSANDCOVID19 (1).pdf905.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.