Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6725
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcHenry, Megan S-
dc.contributor.authorMaldonado, Lauren Y-
dc.contributor.authorAnusu, Gertrude-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Ziyi-
dc.contributor.authorKaluhi, Evelyn-
dc.contributor.authorChristoffersen-Deb, Astrid-
dc.contributor.authorSongok, Julia J-
dc.contributor.authorRuhla, Laura J-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T12:22:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-21T12:22:37Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi. org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00349-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6725-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Over 43% of children living in low- and middle- income countries are at risk for developmental delays; however, access to protective interventions in these settings is limited. We evaluated the effect of maternal participation in Chamas for Change (Chamas)—a community-based women’s health educa- tion program during pregnancy and postpartum—and risk of de- velopmental delay among their children in rural Kenya. Methods: We analyzed developmental screening questionnaire (DSQ) data from a cluster randomized controlled trial in Trans Nzoia County, Kenya (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03187873). Intervention clusters (Chamas) participated in community health volunteer-led, group-based health lessons twice a month during pregnancy and postpartum; controls had monthly home visits (standard of care). We screened all children born during the trial who were alive at 1-year follow-up. We labeled children with any positive item on the DSQ as “at-risk development.” We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and multilevel regression models ( a=.05); analyses were intention-to- treat using individual-level data. Results: Between November 2017 and March 2018, we enrolled 1,920 pregnant women to participate in the parent trial. At 1-year follow-up, we screened 1,273 (689 intervention, 584 con- trol) children born during the trial with the DSQ. Intervention mothers had lower education levels and higher poverty likelihood scores than controls (P<.001 and P=.007, respectively). The overall rate of at-risk development was 3.5%. Children in Chamas clusters demonstrated significantly lower rates of at-risk development than controls (2.5% vs. 4.8%, P=.025). Adjusted analyses revealed lower odds for at-risk development in the inter- vention arm (OR=0.50; 95% confidence interval=0.27, 0.94). Conclusions: Maternal participation in a community-based women’s health education program was associated with lower rates of at-risk development compared to the standard of care. Overall, rates of at-risk development were lower than expected for this population, warranting further investigation. Chamas may help protect children from developmental delay in rural Kenya and other resource-limited settings.en_US
dc.description.sponsorship(Grant No. 0755-03)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherGlob health science and practice.en_US
dc.subjectWomen’s health education programen_US
dc.subjectRisk child developmenten_US
dc.subjectPregnancy and postpartumen_US
dc.titleParticipation in a community-based women's health education program and at-risk child development in rural Kenya: Developmental screening questionnaireresults analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.