Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6467
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Sarah C-
dc.contributor.authorShannon, Harry S-
dc.contributor.authorAyuku, David-
dc.contributor.authorStreiner, David L-
dc.contributor.authorSaarela, Olli-
dc.contributor.authorAtwoli, Lukoye-
dc.contributor.authorBraitstein, Paula-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-27T12:19:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-27T12:19:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-29-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2067381-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6467-
dc.description.abstractThe relationships between care environment, resilience, and social factors in orphaned and separated adolescents and youths (OSAY) in western Kenya are complex and under-studied.Survey responses from OSAY living in Charitable Children’s Institutes (CCI) and family based care settings (FBS) in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya were used to examine the associations between 1) care environment and resilience; 2) care environment and factors thought to promote resili ence (e.g. social, family, and peer support); and 3) resilience and these same resilience-promoting factors, using multivariable linear and logistic regressions. This cross-sectional study included 1202 OSAY (50.4% female) aged 10–26 (mean = 16; SD = 3.5). The mean resilience score in CCIs was 71 (95%CI = 69–73) vs. 64 (95%CI = 62– 66) in FBS. OSAY in CCIs had higher resilience (β = 7.67; 95% CI = 5.26–10.09), social support (β = 0.26; 95%CI = 0.14–0.37), and peer support (β = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.64–1.17) than those in FBS. OSAY in CCIs were more likely to volunteer than those in FBS (OR = 3.72; 95%CI = 1.80–7.68), except in the male subgroup. Family (β = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.24–0.60), social (β = 4.19; 95%CI = 2.53–5.85), and peer (β = 2.13; 95%CI = 1.44–2.83) relationships were positively associated with resilience in all analyses. Volunteering was positively associated with resilience (β = 5.85; 95%CI = 1.51–10.19). The factor most strongly related to resilience in both fully adjusted models was peer support. This study found a strong relationship between care environment and resilience. Care environment and resilience each independently demonstrated strong relationships with peer support, social support, and participating in volunteer activities. Resilience also had a strong relationship with familial support. These data suggest that resilience can be developed through strategic supports to this vulnerable populationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipR01HD060478;en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and francis groupen_US
dc.subjectResilienceen_US
dc.subjectOrphansen_US
dc.subjectSocial supporten_US
dc.subjectEnvironment; peeren_US
dc.titleThe relationships between resilience, care environment, and social-psychological factors in orphaned and separated adolescents in Western Kenyaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.