Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6125
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNjuguna, Benson-
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Sara L-
dc.contributor.authorAkwanalo, Constantine-
dc.contributor.authorAsante, Kwaku Poku-
dc.contributor.authorBaumann, Ana-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Angela-
dc.contributor.authorDavila-Roman, Victor G-
dc.contributor.authorDickhaus, Julia-
dc.contributor.authorFort, Meredith-
dc.contributor.authorLwelunmor, Juliet-
dc.contributor.authorIrazola, Vilma-
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Sailesh-
dc.contributor.authorMutabazi, Vincent-
dc.contributor.authorNewsome, Brad-
dc.contributor.authorOgedegbe, Olugbenga-
dc.contributor.authorPastakia, Sonak D-
dc.contributor.authorK Peprah, Emmanuel-
dc.contributor.authorPlange-Rhule, Jacob-
dc.contributor.authorRoth, Gregory-
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Archana-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T07:36:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-25T07:36:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.mu.ac.ke:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6125-
dc.description.abstractNon-communicable disease (NCD) prevention efforts have traditionally targeted high-risk and high-burden populations. We propose an alteration in prevention efforts to also include emphasis and focus on low-risk populations, predominantly younger individuals and low prevalence populations. We refer to this approach as “proactive prevention.” This emphasis is based on the priority to put in place policies, programs, and infrastructure that can disrupt the epidemiological transition to develop NCDs among these groups, thereby averting future NCD crises. Proactive prevention strategies can be classified, and their implementation pri oritized, based on a 2-dimensional assessment: impact and feasibility. Thus, potential inter ventions can be categorized into a 2-by-2 matrix: high impact/high feasibility, high impact/ low feasibility, low impact/high feasibility, and low impact/low feasibility. We propose thathigh impact/high feasibility interventions are ready to be implemented (act), while high impact/low feasibility interventions require efforts to foster buy-in first. Low impact/high feasibility interventions need to be changed to improve their impact while low impact/low feasibility might be best re-designed in the context of limited resources. Using this framework, policy makers, public health experts, and other stakeholders can more effectively prioritize and leverage limited resources in an effort to slow or prevent the evolving global NCD crisis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPLOS ONEen_US
dc.subjectNon-communicable diseaseen_US
dc.subjectLow-burden populationsen_US
dc.titleProactive prevention: Act now to disrupt the impending non-communicable disease crisis in low-burden populationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:School of Medicine

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NJUGUNA.pdf632.46 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.